fernandopartridge
Well-Known Member
You can't have an alliance when you've got no real common ground. I wouldn't vote for it.I think it requires a formal Lib-Lab-Green alliance to be honest.
You can't have an alliance when you've got no real common ground. I wouldn't vote for it.I think it requires a formal Lib-Lab-Green alliance to be honest.
You can't have an alliance when you've got no real common ground. I wouldn't vote for it.
I mean a stand down agreement to allow the anti Tory to win more seats.
I mean a stand down agreement to allow the anti Tory to win more seats.
Id rather not vote than vote Green or Lib Dem, sorry.
Why’s that?
Why’s that?
Id rather not vote than vote Green or Lib Dem, sorry.
Probably as he doesn’t believe in their politics what you are trying to create is a belief that Labour aren’t good enough to govern so whore your principals to any non Tory that may win a seat
I won’t vote for science deniers or Tories, I’m a rational left winger
Both would and have side against Labour when push came to shove. (Coalition and Scotland for two recent examples).
Greens are anti GMO and anti Nuclear which makes them pro climate change and hunger. Plus they have a member created manifesto which is just batshit.
Lib Dem’s are the worst of all worlds, overly woke nonsense mixed with soft Tory economics. Lala land all round.
At least their candidate had more to tell me than their being a Corbynista
Locally go for who you like but nationally both hate Labour more than the Tories. There’s no winning strategy for Labour that involves handing them seats.
You need to take a step back. What’s happening is a demographic realignment and bugger all to do with any of the leaders.
If Labour want to survive it, they need to become either anti woke or much more pro business and NIMBY.
I suspect we’ll end up with the national socialism (in name only) of the Tories and the international neoliberalism of the Lib Dem’s while the Greens and Labour fight it out for the 20% student vote.
Personally I don’t think the Tories have either the wit nor the capacity to hold onto the left wing economic vote. Ultimately they are donor driven not member driven and their new voters like all voters will demand their material needs are met and they’ll have to pick between the voters and the donors. Johnson is a very special Tory and he hasn’t the energy to last like Blair or Thatcher did. What comes next on all sides will be very interesting.
Locally go for who you like but nationally both hate Labour more than the Tories. There’s no winning strategy for Labour that involves handing them seats.
Come on guys, don't swallow this shite about realignment. It's about Labour abandoning their core vote to grasp at the centre-ground and failing miserably, and then their core vote going elsewhere giving huge losses to the party.
Happened in Scotland and now happening in the North and Midlands.
Given that Labour will never win a GE again
Extraordinary
Do you see it happening in your lifetime? How do they suddenly flip 100 seats when the previous heartlands are lost?
Well the Tories did
What is the path to Labour winning? Because from where I'm standing, Scotland is lost for good, the North isn't coming back any time soon which leaves Wales, London and some parts of the Midlands. The party isn't exactly going to make inroads in North East Somerset
Why is Scotland lost for good? You’re bound to know an awful lot more than me on this, but I think it’s probably where they could make the most inroads (aside from flipping back the ‘red wall’).
Right now that’s probably CON +2Tory MP Imran Ahmad Khan accused of sexually assaulting 15-year-old boy
MP for Wakefield, who is facing trial over allegations of groping teenager in 2008, can now be named after reporting restrictions liftedwww.telegraph.co.uk
Not a great look.
Right now that’s probably CON +2
Not really a party political thing is it
No maybe not to be fair…Not really a party political thing is it