Are you allowed to say two people look alike? Of course.
But he didn't say that.
It's not my fault you didn't read the story properly.
What a load of bullshit from yourself as usual.
I asked if it was or not. You know..... as debate. Are we only allowed to say it about white people? Have you ever said yourself that two people look similar? We all have. The context needs to be looked at.
Then something else comes up. That's different. But the comment I first replied to was just two people looking similar. Is it allowed?
You're all missing the crux of the matter.
The fact is Jack Straw shook Robert Mugabes hand almost 20 years ago and that's the real issue of the day.
NO ONE SAID A HANDSHAKE MAKES UP FOR ANY COMMENT MADE
You were both saying......Point out where someone said a handshake made up for a comment made.
Idiots paradise coming on here from the Sunderland board.
That literally isn't excusing it at all. Is your brain cavity filled with marshmallows?You were both saying......
You were both saying......
Oh dear
And again.....Are you allowed to say two people look alike? Of course.
But he didn't say that.
It's not my fault you didn't read the story properly.
You were both saying......
It doesn't matter that he said he couldn't see him in a room without much light because the handshake was of more importance.That literally isn't excusing it at all. Is your brain cavity filled with marshmallows?
You said nobody put on here that two people look alike. Yet it was you who put it up. You said nobody put more importance on a handshake than a racist comment. But it was also you that said it.Saying what? You're not making any sense.
Look I'm not trying to suggest you're a racist or anything, I just think you must have got the wrong end of the stick here because your argument is very strange and you're not making much sense.
Oh my fucking christ mate.It doesn't matter that he said he couldn't see him in a room without much light because the handshake was of more importance.
No. The comment was also made.
It doesn't matter that he said he couldn't see him in a room without much light because the handshake was of more importance.
No. The comment was also made.
Oh my fucking christ mate.
It was a post pointing out the insanity of somebody else posting something, that nobody agrees is a good thing, that happened 17 years ago to deflect from something, that people are deflecting away from, that's happened today.
If you don't get it you are either incredibly thick or just trolling.
Exactly.Fucking hell
Exactly.
A little secret for you. Racists and racism isn't just the Tories and UKIP. It is everywhere you look. I didn't know the rest of the story. But saying two people look similar isn't racist in itself.
So are you saying we shouldn't look back at historical racism? Do we have a time cut off? Should statues of racists continue to exist? Should we keep them to help with education? Is a football player OK to have made comments years ago? Or does it depend on your political agenda?"Hey guys I know there was a racism today but if we don't now sit through every bit of recorded racism since Cecil Rhodes set off and condemn that too then you're a a hypocrite.
I'm very smart"
How are you missing the point so spectacularly.So are you saying we shouldn't look back at historical racism? Do we have a time cut off? Should statues of racists continue to exist? Should we keep them to help with education? Is a football player OK to have made comments years ago? Or does it depend on your political agenda?
Ah so I don't understand your last stupid message.How are you missing the point so spectacularly.
All racism should be condemned. Nobody has defended what Jack Straw said (fair play Grendal this has worked brilliantly).
To bring up historical racism when talking about something that is happening today is deflecting.
Do you get that very simple point?
I am saying that you don't allow a racist to get away with things they've done today by talking about something another racist did in the past.Ah so I don't understand your last stupid message.
OK.
And what a racist said in the past shouldn't be ignored because more recent racism has happened. It should all be called out.I am saying that you don't allow a racist to get away with things they've done today by talking about something another racist did in the past.
Pretty easy really.
But when you're talking about a serving politician being racist then bringing up everything else lets them off the hook.And what a racist said in the past shouldn't be ignored because more recent racism has happened. It should all be called out.
Are you trying to get me to agree with what I already agree with?But when you're talking about a serving politician being racist then bringing up everything else lets them off the hook.
Do you want us to just say all racism from every politician ever is bad no matter what the colour of the rosette then we can go back and discuss the government of today being racist?
One Conservative MP has today been racist.Are you trying to get me to agree with what I already agree with?
It wasn't me who tried to say a handshake was more important than the colour of someone's skin.
Not all Tories are racist. Not all Labour are racist. Not all white people are racist. Not all black people are non racist. Anyone who says differently has an agenda.
But saying that the Tory government is racist is saying all Tories are racist. Does this include all black Tory MP's?
They are not fit to govern. But that is a different matter.
And I have agreed with this. Try looking back. But it doesn't make everyone involved in the Tory government a racist.One Conservative MP has today been racist.
Why are you doing this?
The sudden switch to non-racist is an interesting thing to do. If I were you I'd stop digging.Are you trying to get me to agree with what I already agree with?
It wasn't me who tried to say a handshake was more important than the colour of someone's skin.
Not all Tories are racist. Not all Labour are racist. Not all white people are racist. Not all black people are non racist. Anyone who says differently has an agenda.
But saying that the Tory government is racist is saying all Tories are racist. Does this include all black Tory MP's?
They are not fit to govern. But that is a different matter.
You've said it's point scoring, it isn't racist, that it hadn't been proven he said it then went on a mad tangent about something else.And I have agreed with this. Try looking back. But it doesn't make everyone involved in the Tory government a racist.
Why are you doing this?
Explain yourself for once.The sudden switch to non-racist is an interesting thing to do. If I were you I'd stop digging.
Tory. Racist comment most important.You've said it's point scoring, it isn't racist, that it hadn't been proven he said it then went on a mad tangent about something else.
It is considering you had been saying what you said nobody had saidThis is really quite something.
It is considering you had been saying what you said nobody had said
As mugabe was a racist is it racist to be racist towards him?Can you please point out where anyone on here has said the Jack Straw incident is either:
A) perfectly fine because he's Labour
B) perfectly fine because of a handshake
Don't you start!As mugabe was a racist is it racist to be racist towards him?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?