Kuenssberg has gone off message!
It is so strange to be on the same side of people in this thread that I normally argue with on most off topic chat subjects.
Kuenssberg has gone off message!
I did all but beg the church official to allow this one, 31st person, but they refused. They were determined to stick to the rules that had been laid down.You asked whether Otis was responsible for the 31st person. Course he could have done it would have been absolutely the right thing to do
I know I’m sorry. Grendel like Boris doesn’t give a shitI did all but beg the church official to allow this one, 31st person, but they refused. They were determined to stick to the rules that had been laid down.
I didn't think just one more would have made that much of a difference, but the church were very worried they would get into trouble.
But what if some hypothetical nurses had hypothetical leaving drinks at the end of their hypothetical shift? /Rob
Spend months telling us there's nothing they can do.
Then on the eve of Sue Grey report they decide they can do something.
Convenient!
To be fair she takes her role as Secretary of State for Propaganda very seriously.I'm convinced kuenssberg and Johnson have had a fling in the past, she talks like she wants to jump his bones. Flawed genius, most gifted politician of the last 40-50 years.
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
I can’t work out if Johnson breaking the rules is down to:
Duffer
The Met
Durham Police
Thatcher
Sadiq Khan
PVA
Dominic Cummings
Kier Starmer
SBT
Can someone clear up if it’s any of these or just the prime minister continuing his lifetime of being a c**t who thinks rules don’t apply to him.
Johnson knowingly and delibrately broke rules he set because he doen't think rules apply to him and the country is a fucking basket case because of the way he's running it.This is of course all jolly good fun but let’s be real for one second and not in the SBT playground
If say Johnson slashed income tax tomorrow and we rode out the crises and everyone was better off he could have had lap dancers on expenses at this “party” abs he’d win the next election. He could have lived like a monk during it and the county is a basket case and he will lose it
That’s real politics
Johnson knowingly and delibrately broke rules he set because he doen't think rules apply to him and the country is a fucking basket case because of the way he's running it.
That's real politics.
Yet you're often talking about his large majority and how it will be nearly impossible for Labour to overcome that. Which kind of makes your argument a load of bollocks,
And who is largely responsible for all of this?I don't think he should resign!
If he broke the law he should face the consequences, the same as every one else, which is a fine as I understand it.
Are you going to force everyone in public office who attended these so called parties to resign? If so there wouldn't be many of the fuckers left. (possibly a good thing)
Meanwhile this sad debacle is now overshadowing every issue that now faces us, such as the increasing reliance on food banks, and the increasing numbers who can't heat their homes. Not to mention rapidly rising inflation, the imminent recession, and the ongoing war in Ukrain etc etc.
I see you're falling for the rhetoric of saying they're all at it so don't trust any of them. The argument used by those doing the worst offending.fatso said:Fucking grow up.
Do you honestly believe for one minute that they wernt all breaking the rules at some point, do you really believe that ALL the rules regarding burials etc wernt completely OTT. OF course they fucking were.
We can all agree that the gatherings the drinks and the takeaways were reprehensible, but we have given these muppets a mandate to run the country, and believe it or not, we have more fucking issues that need addressing.
If both party leaders resign, it won't change what happened, it will just change the names of those who you are screaming at to resign.
No doubt you'll be first in the queue for the monkey pox jab.I think the anti vax shite you posted before disqualifies you from comment to be honest
I didn't say I was happy to tolerate the BS, I'm saying that's what happens, no amount of sabre rattling on here is going to change it.You've already said you're happy to tolerate lies and criminality from our MPs because they're basically all the same.
I don't need a high horse to rise above that, to get out of the gutter you just need to step on the kerb.
And the food bank queue is getting longer because those in government don't actually give a fuck.I didn't say I was happy to tolerate the BS, I'm saying that's what happens, no amount of sabre rattling on here is going to change it.
Meanwhile, while you cry over yesterday's issue, the queue at the food bank gets longer. Maybe you have enough money to not be bothered by it. I'd sooner the cost of living crisis was the major headline.
Possibly, but we arnt even asking them that question. I'd sooner ask that than what did you drink with your birthday cake!And the food bank queue is getting longer because those in government don't actually give a fuck.
If Amazon hadn’t stopped open who would have sold all the toilet roll to Germany to make sure the shortage really bit.
No doubt you'll be first in the queue for the monkey pox jab.
There is a flip side to that. It’s clear the government don’t want to take “drastic” measures to help with the cost of living crisis. Just tonight the tune is changing. Why? They need a distraction from the drinks and birthday cake questions. Ironically them doing the wrong thing and people not shutting up about it may ultimately force them to do the right things regarding the cost of living crisis.Possibly, but we arnt even asking them that question. I'd sooner ask that than what did you drink with your birthday cake!
So are the Durham police bent?
Stephen LaurenceWell let's consider some of the things to have happened on the Met's watch
A strip search of a 15 year old black girl where she was forced to remove a sanitary towel
Sharing photos and selfies of murder scenes
Dismissing a black man's complaints of not being able to breathe as 'nonsense'
Various officers charged with sexual offences, in a number of cases committed over a period of years
Thousands of complaints over the misuse of stop and search
Trying to legally challenge a vigil over Sarah Everard who of course got murdered by a member of the Met
And above all, the acting replacement for Cressida Dick acknowledging that there is a wider problem in the force beyond some rogue characters. The £50 fine for certain people when others were fined £10,000 and booted out of university is the icing on the cake.
Perhaps those fined were there all night, got pissed up and needed a taxi home? Maybe they were the ones organsing it and ordering the pizza or popping round to bargin booze or whatever this lot get up to. I honestly don't know and if he's got off with it, maby he wasn't the party animal most people want him to be. IMHO the Met shouldn't divulge anything that doesn't legally need to be in the public domain, that's a violation of data protection and could break of the trust of those offering evidence. People moan about plod, but expect them to break the law when it suits. If Durham do/don't fine Sir K, that's their business.People at the gathering got a FPN, others didn’t. The Met needs to explain that.
No they weren't during lockdown. Just making the point that if he hasn't been fined, maybe he was asked to come in and make a speech for the person departing. Not sticking up for Boris at all but if just attending is against regs, Durham plod must make sure they fine Sir K too.these parties you had, were they during a time of lockdown? all gatherings were banned so just attending is against the regulations.
Duffer believes the Met are bent - he’s a moron best pity and ignore
I know what you mean mate.Perhaps those fined were there all night, got pissed up and needed a taxi home? Maybe they were the ones organsing it and ordering the pizza or popping round to bargin booze or whatever this lot get up to. I honestly don't know and if he's got off with it, maby he wasn't the party animal most people want him to be. IMHO the Met shouldn't divulge anything that doesn't legally need to be in the public domain, that's a violation of data protection and could break of the trust of those offering evidence. People moan about plod, but expect them to break the law when it suits. If Durham do/don't fine Sir K, that's their business.
Stephen PortStephen Laurence
Daniel Morgan
How many times has it been said that the regulations were different for Johson's and Starmer's incidents.No they weren't during lockdown. Just making the point that if he hasn't been fined, maybe he was asked to come in and make a speech for the person departing. Not sticking up for Boris at all but if just attending is against regs, Durham plod must make sure they fine Sir K too.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?