2 year recession incoming.........
Interest rates have been too low though haven't they? There must be a fair few people that are mainly savers and would like to rely on those savings generating a decent income. I'm not claiming to be an expert in economics but wouldn't it be a good thing if the base rate stayed at around 3%? What rate would be viewed as affordable for borrowers whilst still giving decent interest to those who have managed to build up some savings?
I don't want inspiring, I don't want charismatic, I don't want characters, I don't want populists.He's not the most inspiring of BOE leaders is he?
I may regret asking, and it's not just aimed at you but, you've given me an 'in'...New mini budget is massive for the Tories. Fuck that and there’s no way back at next GE
Well it's all and was the last time down to assetization of the property market and will again.Due to inflation savings are still losing value while mortgage are, or are going to, rise sharply, not great news for anyone really.
Only losing value if you spend at the inflated prices, I don't spend a lot so the extra interest I'll be getting is more than than the inflation on my costs. I don't see that everyone is losing out with this, and 3% is still low really.Due to inflation savings are still losing value while mortgage are, or are going to, rise sharply, not great news for anyone really.
Only losing value if you spend at the inflated prices, I don't spend a lot so the extra interest I'll be getting is more than than the inflation on my costs. I don't see that everyone is losing out with this, and 3% is still low really.
Not if savings are your only form of income.Only losing value if you spend at the inflated prices, I don't spend a lot so the extra interest I'll be getting is more than than the inflation on my costs. I don't see that everyone is losing out with this, and 3% is still low really.
The only thing of any great value that I'd be buying would be a nicer house, and there's all sorts of figures coming out today about how much they will drop in value, so for me, and I know I'm not representing the majority here, that would be good as well. House prices are too high aren't they, isn't that universally accepted, at some point they were always going to have to come down.I don't think that's right, prices aren't going to drop on anything any time soon so whether you spend your savings or not their buying is diminished.
And 3 percent may not seem that high but its going to spell hardship for a lot of people.
The only thing of any great value that I'd be buying would be a nicer house, and there's all sorts of figures coming out today about how much they will drop in value, so for me, and I know I'm not representing the majority here, that would be good as well. House prices are too high aren't they, isn't that universally accepted, at some point they were always going to have to come down.
I'm not suggesting high inflation is good, I just don't see that a base rate of 3% is a bad thing, and isn't the idea that increasing it will bring down inflation anyway? What is the alternative?
Still peddling this nonsense about money printing causing demandGot to happen unfortunately. The Fed raised theirs again by 0.75 yesterday and then came out and said that they expect the terminal rate (when they finally stop raising) to be higher than anticipated as their core inflation hasn’t started coming down as hoped
Basically Americas fiscal policy* of chucking money at everyone and everything causing massive demand led inflation has fucked things for a lot of countries…especially the EU and ourselves that have also got the wars energy inflation to deal with…and then Trussenomics (although impact of that’s pretty much unwound now). International shitshow !
*in conjunction with post covid supply/demand issues
This is the plan they are actively pursuingBBC News - Bank of England expects UK to fall into longest ever recession
Bank of England expects UK to fall into longest ever recession
The Bank of England raises interest rates to 3%, marking the biggest rise for 33 years.www.bbc.co.uk
Interest rates have been too low though haven't they? There must be a fair few people that are mainly savers and would like to rely on those savings generating a decent income. I'm not claiming to be an expert in economics but wouldn't it be a good thing if the base rate stayed at around 3%? What rate would be viewed as affordable for borrowers whilst still giving decent interest to those who have managed to build up some savings?
I may regret asking, and it's not just aimed at you but, you've given me an 'in'...
Is there *anything* that can persuade you and other potential Tory sympathisers to vote for them at the next election, after the past three years? I don't even mean voting Labour either (there are other options!) but just what it would take to vote Tory next time out?
Still peddling this nonsense about money printing causing demand
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
we’ll never agree on this Fernando but just look at the US and their stock markets and house prices since the start of covid. Printing vast amounts of money (and maintaining minimal interest rates) boosts asset values and predominantly benefits the richest in society and there is no way all their inflation is just post covid supply issues
ps QE stops, interest rate rises, surprisingly stock markets and asset values start to dip
Grocery inflation in the UK is just over 14%, QE is not causing this. It's goods shortages, supply chain bottlenecks and increased production costs that are causing this.
Demand is driven by the lower percentiles who actually spend their money, the repeated failures of trickle down economics shows that the rich having more assets doesn't stimulate anything.
we’ll never agree on this Fernando but just look at the US and their stock markets and house prices since the start of covid. Printing vast amounts of money (and maintaining minimal interest rates) boosts asset values and predominantly benefits the richest in society and there is no way all their inflation is just post covid supply issues
ps QE stops, interest rate rises, surprisingly stock markets and asset values start to dip
Why though?This is the plan they are actively pursuing
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Interest rates have been too low though haven't they? There must be a fair few people that are mainly savers and would like to rely on those savings generating a decent income. I'm not claiming to be an expert in economics but wouldn't it be a good thing if the base rate stayed at around 3%? What rate would be viewed as affordable for borrowers whilst still giving decent interest to those who have managed to build up some savings?
Aren't the banks using the savings to lend to other people who can be productive in the economy? I'm not hiding it under the bed. Savings haven't been prioritised recently, and they aren't being prioritised now, it's just that they have finally started to increase above 1%.Really don’t see why savings should be prioritised economically. Investments sure, that’s money being productive in the economy, but just hoarding? No that’s the point of inflation: use it or lose it. Money that isn’t flowing is worthless to the economy, particularly in a modern economy where we have social safety nets.
What a bizarre setup. It's almost like each person walks up to pray to Farage
What a wonderfully diverse audience.
But I have a little savings, I'm going to hang onto my meagre savings just in case I need them to pay my fuel bills in 6 months.Really don’t see why savings should be prioritised economically. Investments sure, that’s money being productive in the economy, but just hoarding? No that’s the point of inflation: use it or lose it. Money that isn’t flowing is worthless to the economy, particularly in a modern economy where we have social safety nets.
Which is fine, except for the fact we seem hellbent on helping the rich, who have the ability to hoard, rather than the poor, who don't.Really don’t see why savings should be prioritised economically. Investments sure, that’s money being productive in the economy, but just hoarding? No that’s the point of inflation: use it or lose it. Money that isn’t flowing is worthless to the economy, particularly in a modern economy where we have social safety nets.
But I have a little savings, I'm going to hang onto my meagre savings just in case I need them to pay my fuel bills in 6 months.
Inflation isn't going make me buy a new tele now, rather than next year, in case the price will have gone up. I'll just stick with my current tele.
I'm NOT putting my savings into the economy with the current situation.
EDIT: Just reread this and noticed the last six words. Apologies, didn't notice the satire.
Really don’t see why savings should be prioritised economically. Investments sure, that’s money being productive in the economy, but just hoarding? No that’s the point of inflation: use it or lose it. Money that isn’t flowing is worthless to the economy, particularly in a modern economy where we have social safety nets.
Bunch of UKIP fruitcakes. GB News goes from strength to strength.What a bizarre setup. It's almost like each person walks up to pray to Farage
I see that they're already laying the foundations for the return of themessiahvery naughty boy.
Boris Johnson had enough backers to challenge Rishi Sunak, says 1922 chair
Sir Graham Brady says ex-PM hit threshold of nominations to secure place on final ballot in Tory leadership racewww.theguardian.com
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?