Do you want to discuss boring politics? (36 Viewers)

PVA

Well-Known Member
Dear me you really are a man child

You spent years slagging off everything to do with Corbyn. Now all of a sudden you're in his corner.

You'll do anything to be contrarian.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Fucks sake, I've read some shit on here in my time, and posted a fair bit but that takes the biscuit

How is expelling Corbyn advancing the cause of getting him elected?
Do you think anyone has said I know Starmer nt laid out any concrete plans for fixing our ailing economy and crumbling infrastructure but nows he's expelled Corbyn he's getting my vote.

The centrists are far more obsessed with Corbyn than anyone on the left of the party.
He's a pensioner who's never going to get near the front benches again but who's a long standing and popular MP in a little corner of Lo Don, just let him carry on and deal with the a tual issues that are fucking over a large portion of the people in this country.

PVA is one of your own - embrace him into your labour fold - thank fuck he’s yours
 
  • Haha
Reactions: PVA

PVA

Well-Known Member
How is expelling Corbyn advancing the cause of getting him elected?

Because, and I know you don't like to hear this or don't believe it, his name is toxic. Most people want nothing to do with him and want nothing to do with a party that he is part of. It's not a difficult concept to grasp. Or apparently it is.

With respect you said a Starmer government would be no worse than a Braverman government. Now that is one of the biggest loads of shit ever written on here.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Starmer will be wearing a kilt soon and eating Haggis - safe to say Scotland is remaining in the union and Mcuseless is going to lose seats very quickly
The SNP won't have had a better chance than the UK in enormous political and economic turmoil. If they can't get independence now I doubt they ever will.

Krankie has blown it and ultimately both her and her formal idol Mr Toad could not finish that fence at Gretna
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
You spent years slagging off everything to do with Corbyn. Now all of a sudden you're in his corner.

You'll do anything to be contrarian.

I can’t stand Corbyn but as I said in 2017 I admired his energy and at least you knew what he stood for - I admire Kinnock and foot and benn - I don’t agree on much they said other than their anti EU stance.

Starmer is a shape shifting non entity

Fuck me you really are an idiot
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Because, and I know you don't like to hear this or don't believe it, his name is toxic. Most people want nothing to do with him and want nothing to do with a party that he is part of. It's not a difficult concept to grasp. Or apparently it is.

With respect you said a Starmer government would be no worse than a Braverman government. Now that is one of the biggest loads of shit ever written on here.
He is only getting air time because Starmer keeps mentioning him. He would otherwise be in pretty much total obscurity around about now and doing no harm to the party besides winning it an extra seat.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
Because, and I know you don't like to hear this or don't believe it, his name is toxic. Most people want nothing to do with him and want nothing to do with a party that he is part of. It's not a difficult concept to grasp. Or apparently it is.

With respect you said a Starmer government would be no worse than a Braverman government. Now that is one of the biggest loads of shit ever written on here.

How many votes do you think Starmer will gain by expelling Corbyn?

As regard the Braverman comment can you link the post?
And what is a Braverman government?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
He is only getting air time because Starmer keeps mentioning him. He would otherwise be in pretty much total obscurity around about now and doing no harm to the party besides winning it an extra seat.

Why bother
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
How many votes do you think Starmer will gain by expelling Corbyn?

As regard the Braverman comment can you link the post?
And what is a Braverman government?

I have no idea. But they've obviously decided it's a net gain. I think you underestimate just how many people despise Corbyn.


And here is the Braverman stuff

 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
I have no idea. But they've obviously decided it's a net gain. I think you underestimate just how many people despise Corbyn.


And here is the Braverman stuff

Corbyn's been stripped of the whip and was publicly distanced from the new management of the party. I think pretty much most people who cared in the first place understand that he is far removed from the top of the party now.

All the current activity is doing is giving Corbyn's name air time which it otherwise wouldn't have. When there is actually a big slobbering mess of a Tory government that should be getting both barrels.
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
I have no idea. But they've obviously decided it's a net gain. I think you underestimate just how many people despise Corbyn.


And here is the Braverman stuff

The people that despise Corbyn the most are centrist Dads like you because your guy is about as inspirational as cholera.

If Starmer literally had any vision, guile, personality or belief system he would have left Corbyn alone to potter about in North Islington but instead he’s picking a fight with him because that’s all he has to offer.

It’s utterly pathetic on his part, and almost as pathetic watching you tie yourself in knots trying to talk him up.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
I have no idea. But they've obviously decided it's a net gain. I think you underestimate just how many people despise Corbyn.


And here is the Braverman stuff


So just to correct you, my comments were aimed at a particular argument where Reeves didn't criticise Bravermans policy on immigration but said it wasn't being implemented quickly enough. So in my opinion, Starmer was in no place to criticise the policy.

Here's the interview:



So your comment about 'a Braverman government' whatever that is, is incorrect.
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
The people that despise Corbyn the most are centrist Dads like you because your guy is about as inspirational as cholera.

If Starmer literally had any vision, guile, personality or belief system he would have left Corbyn alone to potter about in North Islington but instead he’s picking a fight with him because that’s all he has to offer.

It’s utterly pathetic on his part, and almost as pathetic watching you tie yourself in knots trying to talk him up.

I'm not talking Starmer up, I'm talking Corbyn down.
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
I can't be arsed with this anymore. It's ridiculous.

Corbyn had his chance, twice, and fucked it. He had his chance to apologise for his behaviour and keep his place in the party, he fucked that too. Good riddance.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
I can't be arsed with this anymore. It's ridiculous.

Corbyn had his chance, twice, and fucked it. He had his chance to apologise for his behaviour and keep his place in the party, he fucked that too. Good riddance.

He apologised in 2018, do you want him to make it an annual event?


Just leave this here again FsT_l-eaUAErIzD.jpeg.jpg
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
The people that despise Corbyn the most are centrist Dads like you because your guy is about as inspirational as cholera.

If Starmer literally had any vision, guile, personality or belief system he would have left Corbyn alone to potter about in North Islington but instead he’s picking a fight with him because that’s all he has to offer.

It’s utterly pathetic on his part, and almost as pathetic watching you tie yourself in knots trying to talk him up.

I've no time for Sunak, but can you imagine him getting into a national bun fight with, say, Desmond Swayne? Course not, he may be a tory prick but he's not stupid.
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
He apologised in 2018, do you want him to make it an annual event?


Just leave this here againView attachment 28848
People like PVA will never be happy no matter how many times Corbyn apologises. They will just move or tweak the conditions.

In the meantime maybe their guy should apologise for some of his questionable choices when he was the DPP, like some of his utterly draconian sanctions he dished out after the 2011 riots, his fervent excitement to extradite an autistic man to the US.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
And yet...

And yet no ones saying he should have another crack at a GE, just that ge should be allowed to carry on representing the constituency he has done for the last 40 years.
And if they don't want him they'll let him know at the ballot box.
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
And yet nothing…. Any time you want that charity bet feel free to step up.

And yet he's going to win an election.

Congratulations on Corbyn for not winning an election. Worthy of celebration indeed.

I said I'd gladly give some money to charity without the bet.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Just seen some of the footage of Theresa Coffey at a select committee today. I didn’t think it possible but I think that there’s possibly a minister who understands less about their responsibilities and brief of their department than Dorries did about hers. She makes Nads look competent.
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
And yet he's going to win an election.

Congratulations on Corbyn for not winning an election. Worthy of celebration indeed.

I said I'd gladly give some money to charity without the bet.
That may well be true. And I will be able to look forward to him not making a single measurable change in my life or that of my children.

How exciting.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
And yet he's going to win an election.

Congratulations on Corbyn for not winning an election. Worthy of celebration indeed.

I said I'd gladly give some money to charity without the bet.
This Conservative government is on track to be the worst since World War 2. Labour's lead is pretty much down to that.

You think a man with no charisma, no firm beliefs and from a London constituency just won everyone round on his own?
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Maybe he will, maybe he won't.

But he can't do fuck all if he doesn't get elected.

Perfect policy in opposition is pointless. Something the Corbyn cult don't seem to have grasped.
To get elected he needs to get people to vote for him, and when push comes to shove how is he going to do it?
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
Just seen some of the footage of Theresa Coffey at a select committee today. I didn’t think it possible but I think that there’s possibly a minister who understands less about their responsibilities and brief of their department than Dorries did about hers. She makes Nads look competent.

Saw it, painful to watch.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Because, and I know you don't like to hear this or don't believe it, his name is toxic. Most people want nothing to do with him and want nothing to do with a party that he is part of. It's not a difficult concept to grasp. Or apparently it is.

With respect you said a Starmer government would be no worse than a Braverman government. Now that is one of the biggest loads of shit ever written on here.
Citation needed
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
Goodnight lads

816b888dd1d491157c790c7af1bc69dfY29udGVudHNlYXJjaCwxNjE2MjUxMjEy-2.58680699.jpg
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top