And some CBD?Whack some butter in your coffee in the morning, it's good for you!
And some CBD?Whack some butter in your coffee in the morning, it's good for you!
It will have, but as a 34 year old man my maintenance calories really ought to be around 2500.
Hi, I voted for the supposed party of organised Labour a few weeks ago. I was wondering when the left wing policies would arrive?
Good evening, they're just tacking to the left now
£1.4 billion.Keep going hey, save the 1.4 M on energy support or whatever it is and give it away!
Hi, I voted for the supposed party of organised Labour a few weeks ago. I was wondering when the left wing policies would arrive?
Good evening, they're just tacking to the left now
That being the case we really may as well just have let Rishi Rich have 5 more years.Really makes you wonder what she is going to do and now she is going to raise funds. Suggestions that the private schools VAT may be delayed to next academic year and that she has been warned of putting flat rate tax relief on pensions.
Weirdly, you probably need a slight increase to kickstart it again.It will have, but as a 34 year old man my maintenance calories really ought to be around 2500.
Diet would be more significant for weight loss I think. I could train like a maniac but if I eat like shit I will get fatter and feel like shit. There is a saying "you can't out train a bad diet" and it's true. That's not saying exercise isn't important because it is for general health and mental wellbeing.not sure I agree with ‘much more’ significant
She does not need to raise funds to pay for anything, however, she's now going to be hoisted by her own petard for pretending that she does, as I predicted would be the case on here many times over the past few months and years.Really makes you wonder what she is going to do and now she is going to raise funds. Suggestions that the private schools VAT may be delayed to next academic year and that she has been warned of putting flat rate tax relief on pensions.
I didn’t say she needed to, but she clearly intends to - and as you suggest will look like the arse she is if she doesn’t do so having made such a point of needing to stop the winter fuel allowance because if the supposed black hole.She does not need to raise funds to pay for anything, however, she's now going to be hoisted by her own petard for pretending that she does, as I predicted would be the case on here many times over the past few months and years.
Look over there it's Jimminy CrumlinsI see you’re an Islamist now Jeremy
Look over there it's Jimminy Crumlins
He abstained in the vote being discussed according to the article whereas those he "teamed up" with, voted in favour of the motion.Look where you like, but I won’t stop pointing out how the supposed most left wing man in Britain has teamed up with the most regressive group of MPs in the house.
some butters are really good for you..
He abstained in the vote being discussed according to the article whereas those he "teamed up" with, voted in favour of the motion.
Hmm we'll see I guess, transferring wealth opportunities to foreign entities,look no closer than France then, certainly get some ackers if you chucked on at the start.I sometimes wonder what these people are on.
Anger over ‘bonkers’ UK plan to reach net zero by importing wood to burn
Government criticised over list of potential sources of biomass, which includes North Korea and Afghanistanwww.theguardian.com
A plan by the British government to burn biomass imported from countries including North Korea and Afghanistan has been described as “bonkers”, with critics saying it undermines the credibility of the UK’s climate strategy.
A bioenergy resource model, published in late summer, calculates that only a big expansion in the import of energy crops and wood from a surprising list of nations would satisfy the UK’s plan to meet net zero.
The government wants biomass to play a “significant role” in decarbonising all sectors of the economy in the years leading up to 2050, and has provided more than £20bn to businesses using it in the power and heat sectors over the past two decades.
Really going for that Reform UK vote.Badenoch and Jenerick
Really going for that Reform UK vote.
Is it still down to members? If so Jenrick walks it.
Would take something special to be less popular than this masquerading Labour governmentthere wasn't exactly many 'good' options but how the fuck have they ended up with these two???
maybe things are worse than we thought and they've already decided to deliberately thrown the next election
there wasn't exactly many 'good' options but how the fuck have they ended up with these two???
maybe things are worse than we thought and they've already decided to deliberately thrown the next election
Wonder if either would even make it to next election
I think actually Badenoch would be tougher opposition for wet lettuce Starmer than Jenrick, who just has massive IDS vibesExactly that. BadEnoch would just complete the seeming capture of the Tory party by the right-wing culture war loons.
I suspect a rebellion would play out in fairly short order from the slightly more sensible MPs, but who really knows.
Capture from the right of a party and brooking no dissent is becoming a thing, it seems.
I think actually Badenoch would be tougher opposition for wet lettuce Starmer than Jenrick, who just has massive IDS vibes
I sometimes wonder what these people are on.
Anger over ‘bonkers’ UK plan to reach net zero by importing wood to burn
Government criticised over list of potential sources of biomass, which includes North Korea and Afghanistanwww.theguardian.com
A plan by the British government to burn biomass imported from countries including North Korea and Afghanistan has been described as “bonkers”, with critics saying it undermines the credibility of the UK’s climate strategy.
A bioenergy resource model, published in late summer, calculates that only a big expansion in the import of energy crops and wood from a surprising list of nations would satisfy the UK’s plan to meet net zero.
The government wants biomass to play a “significant role” in decarbonising all sectors of the economy in the years leading up to 2050, and has provided more than £20bn to businesses using it in the power and heat sectors over the past two decades.
How long does this form of energy last for,as long as there's humanity on the planet I guess ?
It's another route to the the same end isn't it?Can someone who knows better tell me if the carbon capture investment thing is better than having more trees? That seems to be the general argument for the respective sides.
To run the planet on bio ethanol you’d need to cover the planet entirely with crops!How long does this form of energy last for,as long as there's humanity on the planet I guess ?