And we have Sisu's word for that................:thinking about:No, because FL rules give anonymity to those with less than a 10% holding, and none of the investors have more than that.
And he got his info from the FL, who got their info from Sisu.No, we have the MP who asked the Football League for their identities...
No, we have the MP who asked the Football League for their identities...
What, are they like Batman and Superman then?
Is Tim Fisher really Clark Kunt?
I presume it is like anything else and there will be a way around one person having more than 10% and getting named
i.e. the same person/company having invested the money under lots of different company names like SISU do.
Or the same person using various different friends business partners and colleagues to invest money so they in fact invest 40% but stay under the 10% radar so they stay secret.
It smacks a bit too convenient to me that no one has invested more than the amount that means you then become named.
However I still standby the fact that the council should not broker any deals with SISU or be subject to their blackmail unless they actually know who they really are dealing with.
Who has invested that money.
For all we know it could be Robert Mugabe
BSB, I think I understand your feelings about Sisu - mine are, I think, the same as yours. But I believe that they would lie to anyone (if they thought they could get away with it) to achieve their ends.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?