Martin180
Well-Known Member
I think it is only a percentage of any profit made , so if Vik was to go for £20 million again we'd get nothing
I think it is only a percentage of any profit made , so if Vik was to go for £20 million again we'd get nothingAren’t most deals structured where original selling club receives a set % of any future deals?
Correct but if that is literally how it’s written, you could see Sporting using the literal interpretation to save some cash.Weren’t you a teacher?
Correct but if that is literally how it’s written, you could see Sporting using the literal interpretation to save some cash.
Thankfully I think contract law is a bit more precise than that.Correct but if that is literally how it’s written, you could see Sporting using the literal interpretation to save some cash.
CorrectThe literal interpretation of reducing 15% by 10% is 13.5%. The correct wording for what you are saying would be 10 percentage points.
It's profile though. A bigger club, doing it in Europe, and becoming one of the main men for Sweden too.A sell on for a 400% profit after six months is for the birds, surely? He's playing in a league no better than the championship now. If top teams didn't want him six months ago, why would they pay so much more now?
This has to be agent talk and clickbait for websites.
But are the Portuguese aware of these nuances in English?The literal interpretation of reducing 15% by 10% is 13.5%. The correct wording for what you are saying would be 10 percentage points.
It’s not a nuance it’s just simple maths. Portuguese know maths. Any of these deals and anyone involved will have lawyers coming out of their arse anywayBut are the Portuguese aware of these nuances in English?
Based on our track record with medicals and translators, bet we just waved it in front of someone at Citizens AdviceIt’s not a nuance it’s just simple maths. Portuguese know maths. Any of these deals and anyone involved will have lawyers coming out of their arse anyway
The nuance is in the potential understanding of the meaning of language, not the mathsIt’s not a nuance it’s just simple maths. Portuguese know maths. Any of these deals and anyone involved will have lawyers coming out of their arse anyway
It’sThe nuance is in the potential understanding of the meaning of language, not the maths
This, in spades. There is only one way to calculate this. It's a common mistake to conflate percentages with percentage points; they are very different things. Nuance has no place in maths.It’s
15% - (0.10 x 15%) = 13.5%
vs
15% - 10% = 5%
There’s no nuance of language to be interpreted.…it’ll be clearly contracted, they are luckily not relying on the 5th hand regurgitation of a forum poster
Are you seriously saying the club’s going to try and persuade Sporting to pay us millions of pounds off the back of some “He’s 28 until he’s 29” shenanigans?The nuance is in the potential understanding of the meaning of language, not the maths
No, but I've heard of people trying to start legal proceedings on more spurious grounds. So many contract lawl cases are people arguing the toss over interpretation and wording.Are you seriously saying the club’s going to try and persuade Sporting to pay us millions of pounds off the back of some “He’s 28 until he’s 29” shenanigans?
They'd be laughed out of court, not that it would get that far.No, but I've heard of people trying to start legal proceedings on more spurious grounds. So many contract lawl cases are people arguing the toss over interpretation and wording.
For what it's worth, for me it would mean it could drop to 13.5%, but that doesn't mean one side or the other wouldn't argue differently to gain a bit of cash.
Coventry City FC. Spurious legals. Surely not?No, but I've heard of people trying to start legal proceedings on more spurious grounds. So many contract lawl cases are people arguing the toss over interpretation and wording.
For what it's worth, for me it would mean it could drop to 13.5%, but that doesn't mean one side or the other wouldn't argue differently to gain a bit of cash.
Well TBF it would have had to be £30 +m in that scenario had he not said where he wanted to go.All the arrogant Prem "fans" doing the whole "who?" bollocks on Twitter.
Not saying he can necessarily do it at a top 6 club, but was 100% worth the gamble for £20m. Now they're going to have to pay 5x to find out
Goal number 2.
Pepe doing his usual dark arts range of shithousery. Vik has a fine 2 nd goal disallowed on a dubious VAR review in the build up to the goal.He’s tearing Pepe apart
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
16 in 20In to double figures now after 14 matches, some big club could well make a move in January.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?