Gyokeres Deal Details (1 Viewer)

Forums New posts
mrtrench

mrtrench

Well-Known Member
A sell on for a 400% profit after six months is for the birds, surely? He's playing in a league no better than the championship now. If top teams didn't want him six months ago, why would they pay so much more now?

This has to be agent talk and clickbait for websites.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
mrtrench said:
A sell on for a 400% profit after six months is for the birds, surely? He's playing in a league no better than the championship now. If top teams didn't want him six months ago, why would they pay so much more now?

This has to be agent talk and clickbait for websites.
Click to expand...
It's profile though. A bigger club, doing it in Europe, and becoming one of the main men for Sweden too.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
robbiekeane said:
It’s not a nuance it’s just simple maths. Portuguese know maths. Any of these deals and anyone involved will have lawyers coming out of their arse anyway
Click to expand...
Based on our track record with medicals and translators, bet we just waved it in front of someone at Citizens Advice
 
Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
robbiekeane said:
It’s not a nuance it’s just simple maths. Portuguese know maths. Any of these deals and anyone involved will have lawyers coming out of their arse anyway
Click to expand...
The nuance is in the potential understanding of the meaning of language, not the maths
 
S

steve cooper

Well-Known Member
As far as I can tell from interpreting what I have read on the internet, is its not a reduction at all but a series of payments once targets are met, which will then be taken into consideration if he is sold, by up to 10%. So if he reaches 25 goals this season it's reported we will receive 1m euros, but that amount will eventually be deducted from any sell on money.
does anyone else see it this way?
www.mirror.co.uk

Chelsea learn Viktor Gyokeres asking price after Victor Osimhen transfer blow

Chelsea boss Mauricio Pochettino is desperate to land a new striker in next month's transfer window but the Blues are encountering huge problems in their quest for attacking reinforcements
www.mirror.co.uk www.mirror.co.uk
So if he gets sold we will still receive the 15% or whatever the figure is, but we might already have received some of it due to targets met. Otherwise the wording makes no sense.
 
Last edited:
itsabuzzard

itsabuzzard

Well-Known Member
robbiekeane said:
It’s

15% - (0.10 x 15%) = 13.5%

vs

15% - 10% = 5%


There’s no nuance of language to be interpreted.…it’ll be clearly contracted, they are luckily not relying on the 5th hand regurgitation of a forum poster
Click to expand...
This, in spades. There is only one way to calculate this. It's a common mistake to conflate percentages with percentage points; they are very different things. Nuance has no place in maths.
 
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
Sky_Blue_Dreamer said:
The nuance is in the potential understanding of the meaning of language, not the maths
Click to expand...
Are you seriously saying the club’s going to try and persuade Sporting to pay us millions of pounds off the back of some “He’s 28 until he’s 29” shenanigans?
 
Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
SBT said:
Are you seriously saying the club’s going to try and persuade Sporting to pay us millions of pounds off the back of some “He’s 28 until he’s 29” shenanigans?
Click to expand...
No, but I've heard of people trying to start legal proceedings on more spurious grounds. So many contract lawl cases are people arguing the toss over interpretation and wording.

For what it's worth, for me it would mean it could drop to 13.5%, but that doesn't mean one side or the other wouldn't argue differently to gain a bit of cash.
 
itsabuzzard

itsabuzzard

Well-Known Member
Sky_Blue_Dreamer said:
No, but I've heard of people trying to start legal proceedings on more spurious grounds. So many contract lawl cases are people arguing the toss over interpretation and wording.

For what it's worth, for me it would mean it could drop to 13.5%, but that doesn't mean one side or the other wouldn't argue differently to gain a bit of cash.
Click to expand...
They'd be laughed out of court, not that it would get that far.
 
MalcSB

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
Sky_Blue_Dreamer said:
No, but I've heard of people trying to start legal proceedings on more spurious grounds. So many contract lawl cases are people arguing the toss over interpretation and wording.

For what it's worth, for me it would mean it could drop to 13.5%, but that doesn't mean one side or the other wouldn't argue differently to gain a bit of cash.
Click to expand...
Coventry City FC. Spurious legals. Surely not?
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
ccfc922 said:
All the arrogant Prem "fans" doing the whole "who?" bollocks on Twitter.

Not saying he can necessarily do it at a top 6 club, but was 100% worth the gamble for £20m. Now they're going to have to pay 5x to find out 🤦‍♂️🤣
Click to expand...
Well TBF it would have had to be £30 +m in that scenario had he not said where he wanted to go.
 
P

ptr

Well-Known Member
It’s honestly almost certain that he will play in the premier league. Don’t think it will be Jan but won’t be long.

Surely Chelsea will offer him a 16 year deal like they do everyone else.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Top