Martin180
Well-Known Member
To be expected though surely .
I think some on here think that Vik goes for £20 million we have to spend the same on transfers
Weird
To be expected though surely .Yeah, not the best news
ZOMG BUCKLE UP GUYS YOU WON’T BELIEVE MY LATEST ANTI KING COMMENT
2 on tatsu to be fair20 take away 3.5 =
hands up everyone
He’s not telling you shit he’s positioningWe have got millions - that's the point. We're being told here that it won't be spent. I'm not sure what people are not understanding
So the fees spent on 2 signings so far were pittance then?We need significant investment on the pitch
So we've got 20 million in the bank already ?20 take away 3.5 =
hands up everyone
The new accounts will be a matter of public record
No I don’t, I said 50%To be expected though surely .
I think some on here think that Vik goes for £20 million we have to spend the same on transfers
Weird
Sorry forgot that. Probably in Euros2 on tatsu to be fair
No they weren’t, another 8/10 to goSo the fees spent on 2 signings so far were pittance then?
Think I’d prefer my chances at the lottery!So we'd get about £9.7m if someone matched that 100m release clause. Not bad.
Couple of points so you maybe understand more: 1) we don't know how much either transfer so far actually cost so your plucking rumoured figures to suit your argument. 2) do you think we are stopping now and not signing any other players?20 take away 3.5 =
hands up everyone
The new accounts will be a matter of public record
We got £17m upfront fee and £2-3m is immediately swallowed up by Brighton’s share20 take away 3.5 =
hands up everyone
The new accounts will be a matter of public record
So you criticise lack of investment then accept we have actually invested...No they weren’t, another 8/10 to go
Yes we’ve invested 4/5 million, with the play off run, vik sale and 19,000 STH on a 50% increase, it’s a solid startSo you criticise lack of investment then accept we have actually invested...
Is it negative? I'm pointing out a contradiction on what he said previously you sausage
sure but we're not paying 3.5 for Simms this week eitherWe got £17m upfront fee and £2-3m is immediately swallowed up by Brighton’s share
To be fair I think it’s 3.5 million up front, to be fair to Dougsure but we're not paying 3.5 for Simms this week either
We haven’t been told that.We have got millions - that's the point. We're being told here that it won't be spent. I'm not sure what people are not understanding
imagine thinking the club would actually go "yeah we're going to spunk a load of this cash on new players" other clubs would be adding a cov taxWe haven’t been told that.
No. Delighted with the intent, also with Japanese geezer. Only a small portion of the Gyokeres fee spent so far however, so hoping for another three or four relatively major signings for this level. If so, then life is goodDid anyone expect 3.5m on Simms?
Better than anything we have done everIs it fuck.
€1.2 + add ons2 on tatsu to be fair
Up front just means before add ons etcTo be fair I think it’s 3.5 million up front, to be fair to Doug
I do agree. But if you know that and I know that, I'm pretty sure the powers that be also know that and are doing something to rectify it.Could do with some defenders though
He’s done more in the short time he’s been here than any of our owners have done since relegation from the PL.
I'm glad that's over. Didn't half drag on that saga.
Whilst I agree it’s too early to tell it’s not an exaggeration to say he’s done more in the short term.This is exaggeration the other way - too early to tell either way
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?