Winny the Bish
Well-Known Member
It's like we failed to get Jerry Yates and just thought "ah fuck it let's do something mental"
It's like we failed to get Jerry Yates and just thought "ah fuck it let's do something mental"
It might mean playing with a front 2 more often but the style of play looks pretty similar.Robins has already basically said in his last interview post-exeter game that we're trying to play a little differently.
Assuming that we were ever in for YatesIt's like we failed to get Jerry Yates and just thought "ah fuck it let's do something mental"
Went through Twitter and the reaction breaks down like this:It’s amazing how quickly some portions of a fan base can go from “He’s one of our own” to “Good riddance, he was shite anyway” once the reality they’re leaving sets in.
Seen it happen here many many times down the years.
You'd sooner miss out on a full International powerhouse centreforward who has scored at a world cup, on a permanent deal, in favour of some guy who's played 20 odd games for Preston on a loan???Pay the £1m Tom Cannon loan fee for starters
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Not necessarilyHamers gone if we’re buying this guy
But it does state £9m + the add on’sThat fee is probably as much 9m as the Simms deal is 8m
Hamers gone if we’re buying this guy
It might mean playing with a front 2 more often but the style of play looks pretty similar.
Not even the Philosopher would be putting this guy in defensive midfieldHamers gone if we’re buying this guy
crossed my mind but he is no where that type of player.
Robins has consistently said if we lose Vik and Hamer it will require us to play a different way to create and score goals. Don’t expect like for like replacements ….crossed my mind but he is no where that type of player.
I imagine Matt's more talking about the money rather than a like for like swap...
According to the comments we've been absolutely scammed.
In my opinion, yes it is. Tom Cannon is highly regarded and knows the English game… this bloke I’ve never heard of
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Robins has consistently said if we lose Vik and Hamer it will require us to play a different way to create and score goals. Don’t expect like for like replacements ….
Can’t see us spending this money on a player unless a deal for Gus has already been agreedI imagine Matt's more talking about the money rather than a like for like swap...
The money would need to go towards Hamer replacements rather than forwards.I imagine Matt's more talking about the money rather than a like for like swap...
Agree with this, unless this has nothing to do with Gus at all which is great news that we’re investing like thisThe money would need to go towards Hamer replacements rather than forwards.
Exactly, unfortunately you have to spell it out simply in little words for some muppets on here.I imagine Matt's more talking about the money rather than a like for like swap...
He scores goals but isn't actually that impressive a striker.
Yes of course, I agreeThe money would need to go towards Hamer replacements rather than forwards.
Who?A bunch of strikers for that price.
Our model is to sell for profit, how are we meant to turn a profit on a player at that price?
We can’t afford Hamer’s wage demands but spunking this much on an unknown player, it’s just baffling
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
In the event Hamer goes we will need a fair bit of cash to add more in midfield.Agree with this, unless this has nothing to do with Gus at all which is great news that we’re investing like this
Is there a big contingent of Americans in Cov?
We're going to need to add another tier to one of the stands to take in these new fans we're going to get!
A contradiction in terms right there.
How do you know what money DK has available?The money would need to go towards Hamer replacements rather than forwards.