MR know he may well lose him and would have agreed to the wage structure, I suspect, so I am sure he has players in mind.
MR know he may well lose him and would have agreed to the wage structure, I suspect, so I am sure he has players in mind.I want Hamer to stay don't get me wrong, but, there are gonna be other players out there. We won't be broken if he goes. Luton, Sheff Utd and Burnley all did pretty good without Hamer in midfield. It's not keep him or implode.
DK is right to keep the wage structure. The club is always bigger then individual players.
Whilst I agree the club is bigger than individual players, I’d like to see us push the boat out a bit more when it comes to wagesI want Hamer to stay don't get me wrong, but, there are gonna be other players out there. We won't be broken if he goes. Luton, Sheff Utd and Burnley all did pretty good without Hamer in midfield. It's not keep him or implode.
DK is right to keep the wage structure. The club is always bigger then individual players.
I’m not criticising people for having a different opinion at all. I’m criticising an apparent obsession with bemoaning a new owner, who on the face of things, has done things this club hasn’t had for years. I hate the entitlement. For years we begged to just be a “normal” club, now we are acting fairly normal for once, and people are saying complete rubbish like “DK has a lot to answer for”. People have their knickers in a twist because some people within the club might lose their jobs - GOOD! The club has been ran terribly for years! I’d be more concerned if people weren’t leaving. People are moaning because DK might be micromanaging - fuck me who can blame him; imagine the shower of shit he walked in to, does that not cross peoples minds? If I was all of a sudden in charge of a business that has the potential to earn MILLIONS but has been ran haphazardly for years then I would micromanage the shit out of it until I had people I fully trusted to do it properly.
I love this forum and visit it most days, but Christ some of you make it difficult to read some days.
But again what is a 'decent budget'? Is that 'budget' before any sales of say Gyokeres and Hamer? Or is it a 'decent budget' based on cash generated from those sales?Just giving robins a decent budget
I don’t think it’s unreasonable to say fans are reserving judgement on him until this summer plays out
of course I appreciate player identification is down to MR, but he can’t keep pulling rabbits out of hats, and there’s where DK comes in
Sniff sniffSo he isn’t Dawkins but someone with a vested interest in corporate side and who is pissed off with DK.
Interesting
For once Grendal I agree with you.There’s obviously an agenda but there are concerns which can be sensibly expressed
The corporate pricing “strategy” was a debacle and shows some naivety at best. It’s clear he had no-one lined up so must have hoped existing customers or the waiting list would renew - it was badly managed
He’s not a big businessman. His company is modest and I doubt requires much customer relations management
So there clearly are issues ahead and the nagging question is why is he here
A decent budget based on cash generated salesBut again what is a 'decent budget'? Is that 'budget' before any sales of say Gyokeres and Hamer? Or is it a 'decent budget' based on cash generated from those sales?
Is a decent budget inclusive of improving facilities and infra structure or are those thing separate from the 'decent budget'?
Robins can't keep pulling rabbits out of a hat - but why should a new owner be judged on one transfer window following years of neglect and shit policies by previous owners?
I personally don’t. However many on here believe he is. I beg to differ, it’s all about opinions on that matter.
Re: sponsors. King priced out any perspective sponsors and there isn’t a queue of potential sponsors as of Monday
This is one of my main if not the only bug bear I say about DK and you agree with this Perry?For once Grendal I agree with you.
I am also of the opinion of most in that he needs to do all he can to keep Hamer at the club. Don’t dig heels in or play hardball. Do what is right for the club, but I’m sure Robins is well in the loop with all this.
He’s not perfect, nobody is. And there are many questions around why he’s here and what the end game for him is.
But some of the agendas are bizarre.
This is one of my main if not the only bug bear I say about DK and you agree with this Perry?
annoying the stance he’s taking re Gus contract
I’m not sure I feel too much sympathy for the players on this one. They are all incredibly well payed and could afford the tickets.I was told he attempted to charge the players for the tickets they are allocated for their families at Wembley. They kicked off and refused them so King put them on sale to fans.
Because I genuinely think they are trueyou have bought into the whole Hamer saga with zero evidence it’s factual
Or someone with a cokehead mate who used to have a box and could watch the man of the match presentation......Nobody here is ‘ITK’ it’s all just guess work….let’s wait and see.
This is exactly my thoughts with regards to questioning his motives. It’s fair to say he isn’t endlessly wealthy, so why has a modest businessman bought a club that realistically he can’t afford to run or finance the targets he’s set for the manager and it’s not a vanity project. What’s his aim? Why has he purchased a football club? He’s not got any previous ties with the club etcThere’s obviously an agenda but there are concerns which can be sensibly expressed
The corporate pricing “strategy” was a debacle and shows some naivety at best. It’s clear he had no-one lined up so must have hoped existing customers or the waiting list would renew - it was badly managed
He’s not a big businessman. His company is modest and I doubt requires much customer relations management
So there clearly are issues ahead and the nagging question is why is he here
So it's yes?It’s not no
You’re almost on the money on 90% of the the stuff you type on here Matt.Because I genuinely think they are true
but of course, nothing is conclusive and I’ve probably taken it as gospel when I shouldn’t I get that
Thank you old boy, thought soYou’re almost on the money on 90% of the the stuff you type on here Matt.
I wouldn’t share some of the stuff I know on here but you’re close to the facts old boy believe me.
This is exactly my thoughts with regards to questioning his motives. It’s fair to say he isn’t endlessly wealthy, so why has a modest businessman bought a club that realistically he can’t afford to run or finance the targets he’s set for the manager and it’s not a vanity project. What’s his aim? Why has he purchased a football club? He’s not got any previous ties with the club etc
Get back in your box Jacqui you stupid bint.Oh, interesting. What would they be spraying out? This is the twitter post mentioned above:
Yeah, I do have concerns about his style / naivety (my phone wants naturists!) / business sense. He got off very easily saying when he came in he hadn't really thought about the ground and that was madness as we needed some kind of plan. We don't know, but the need to squeeze from ticket sales could be magnified by that.There’s obviously an agenda but there are concerns which can be sensibly expressed
The corporate pricing “strategy” was a debacle and shows some naivety at best. It’s clear he had no-one lined up so must have hoped existing customers or the waiting list would renew - it was badly managed
He’s not a big businessman. His company is modest and I doubt requires much customer relations management
So there clearly are issues ahead and the nagging question is why is he here
Just giving robins a decent budget
I don’t think it’s unreasonable to say fans are reserving judgement on him until this summer plays out
of course I appreciate player identification is down to MR, but he can’t keep pulling rabbits out of hats, and there’s where DK comes in
Most of use choose alcoholMind/population control, experimental drugs, choose your KoolAid
I’m in Bali believing in you GIMOCHamer 80% complete. Wages agreed. waiting on formality’s of bonuses and release clauses
He’s working from the new pitch up.I said something very similar earlier on. His previous ties with SISU made a few on here suspicious when it was announced that he was buying 85% of the club.
It’s a relief he’s cleaning up off the pitch but on the pitch is where his mettle will be tested. Hopefully we’re wrong and he puts some investment in and we keep Hamer.
Dude, if you are known to the higher echelons of CCFC or rub shoulders with those jockeying for position, maybe this is not a good place to be spouting what you know. Or are you Machiavelli reincarnated? It’s unhelpful and narcissistic.Because the owner is taking control of all aspects (rightly or wrongly) hence why the issues behind the scenes are coming to a head.
Hamer 80% complete. Wages agreed. waiting on formality’s of bonuses and release clauses
Hamer 80% complete. Wages agreed. waiting on formality’s of bonuses and release clauses
I honestly think it's to be "the bad guy" get the club functioning and flip it at a profit to new owners and slink back off in to the background. If its the case I'm OK with it.This is exactly my thoughts with regards to questioning his motives. It’s fair to say he isn’t endlessly wealthy, so why has a modest businessman bought a club that realistically he can’t afford to run or finance the targets he’s set for the manager and it’s not a vanity project. What’s his aim? Why has he purchased a football club? He’s not got any previous ties with the club etc
Waiting for John Dawkins to confirmHamer 80% complete. Wages agreed. waiting on formality’s of bonuses and release clauses
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?