Has London Bridge fallen ? (2 Viewers)

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
Chris Witts, a former mayor of Gloucester, met the Queen a number of times, in particular when the royal couple sailed into Gloucester Docks to inspect the re-development there.

Quote Message: It was a wonderful hour, I saw her in a really happy mood. We spoke about the press and she said she had some stories about the London press and then burst out into a Cockney accent - I thought this is wonderful. I am so proud to have that hour with the Queen, I will miss her terribly.
It was a wonderful hour, I saw her in a really happy mood. We spoke about the press and she said she had some stories about the London press and then burst out into a Cockney accent - I thought this is wonderful. I am so proud to have that hour with the Queen, I will miss her terribly.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
We've got Charles until he dies, then. They really should modernise so the monarch abdicating is no bad thing. He should have been king ten years ago to allow his Mum a dignified retirement, and likewise for him whenever he gets more frail. He's 75 already!
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Have to say that Charles delivered a very good speech there. To a degree whether you’re a royalist or not (I’m not) is pretty irrelevant, he’s now the head of state and on the basis of his speech I think he’ll do well.
I've always quite liked him, think he got a rough deal mainly because his marriage split up.

Again, can think the person is fine, not the institution. Imagine if he'd she'd without children, we'd be proclaiming King Andrew!
 

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
Have to say that Charles delivered a very good speech there. To a degree whether you’re a royalist or not (I’m not) is pretty irrelevant, he’s now the head of state and on the basis of his speech I think he’ll do well.
I agree Tony. He spoke well

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
I've always quite liked him, think he got a rough deal mainly because his marriage split up.

Again, can think the person is fine, not the institution. Imagine if he'd she'd without children, we'd be proclaiming King Andrew!
I can remember when I was a kid he got loads of shit because he would go on about the environment a lot. Turned out he was right. Doesn’t stop him travelling everywhere by private jet but he was right.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Can’t help but think when he talked about the importance of our parliamentary democracy it was a dig at the last PM and a warning to the new one.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Can’t help but think when he talked about the importance of our parliamentary democracy it was a dig at the last PM and a warning to the new one.
Nah, he's just making clear he's not a dictator.

Same as serve rather than rule.
 

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
It's think it's quite interesting watching this tbh... sure it's a bit boring but it's a little bit of history. Truss looks so fucking awkward though.

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
 

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
Scratch that, my kids having a meltdown so I've had to put Baby TV on.

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
 

Bugsy

Well-Known Member
Just switched it on and the amount of slime there was walking out that room, its fucking atrocious
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
It's just the way she holds herself in general and here it's especially noticeable. Kind of like seeing a goat up a tree, you wonder how the fuck it got there.

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
Tbf it must be quite difficult for an ardent Republican to strike the balance between politeness and belief.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
We've got Charles until he dies, then. They really should modernise so the monarch abdicating is no bad thing. He should have been king ten years ago to allow his Mum a dignified retirement, and likewise for him whenever he gets more frail. He's 75 already!

Should that apply to US presidents as well?
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Should that apply to US presidents as well?
They can get voted out, choose not to stand, or be not allowed to stand again so yes, it already applies.

Not sure why people want to flog old people into the ground tbh. if it was a commoner people would be up in arms.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
They can get voted out, choose not to stand, or be not allowed to stand again so yes, it already applies.

Not sure why people want to flog old people into the ground tbh. if it was a commoner people would be up in arms.

it doesn’t really apply - Biden was elected to be the person to lead the president race - age has nothing to do with it then
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
it doesn’t really apply - Biden was elected to be the person to lead the president race - age has nothing to do with it then
It does apply that when you're unfit to do the tasks of the role, you're not forced to continue it. Charles has been doing most of it for the past five years at least - there should be no obligation of the monarch to continue in role until death, and they should be afforded the respect of an honourable abdication if they feel unable to continue.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top