Match Thread Huddersfield away (4 Viewers)

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
Bizarre. He's usually an alright poster Isn't he? Seems to be windmilling a bit today.

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk

Like last season when he lost the plot after almost every match , joins in with calls for the managers exit and generally was the most negative poster on the forum pre , during and post match ?

He's held it together while we occupied a top 6 place , that was it
 

skybluegod

Well-Known Member
We would be a far far worse team without O'Hare, doesn't mean you can't get annoyed at his wank end product. Both things can be simultaneously true.

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk

Well I guess that depends on the quality of the replacement? If you are talking about players at the club currently then yes 100%. We would certainly be a very different team without O'Hare. But I'd imagine he is one of our highest earners, so if we are talking about is there better out there, there could be better players to improve our position without necessarily improving the style of play

I always thought with O'Hare when we signed him he would develop well and be sold by the end of first two seasons. I really cannot see anybody paying for him at this moment in time. I will happily give him credit when it's due. But there does need to be a bit of realism in that he needs to do far more.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Like last season when he lost the plot after almost every match , joins in with calls for the managers exit and generally was the most negative poster on the forum pre , during and post match ?

He's held it together while we occupied a top 6 place , that was it

He had genuine problems last season and was far from the only one. Happy to cut him some slack today but he's made a series of bizarre posts
 

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
Like last season when he lost the plot after almost every match , joins in with calls for the managers exit and generally was the most negative poster on the forum pre , during and post match ?

He's held it together while we occupied a top 6 place , that was it
Ngl it is partly wumming today and playing devils advocate. For what it’s worth I do think Kane is a decent player but just don’t get how Godden can be considered good enough, and Kane’s crosses be fantastic yet we never seem to score many from all the crosses put in
 

Speedie's Head

Well-Known Member
Matty G, again! What a boy. I said it at the start of the season when Big Vik was bashing them in - he's our no 1 every day of the week.

Should have been 5 or 6 today though, Cal has to score, get the assists or he's a pretty luxury. Come on Cal, mate.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Well I guess that depends on the quality of the replacement? If you are talking about players at the club currently then yes 100%. We would certainly be a very different team without O'Hare. But I'd imagine he is one of our highest earners, so if we are talking about is there better out there, there could be better players to improve our position without necessarily improving the style of play

I always thought with O'Hare when we signed him he would develop well and be sold by the end of first two seasons. I really cannot see anybody paying for him at this moment in time. I will happily give him credit when it's due. But there does need to be a bit of realism in that he needs to do far more.

It's a shame that Chong is injured for so long else we'd have had a decent shout at getting Utd to send him here, wasted under Bowyer
 

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
Like last season when he lost the plot after almost every match , joins in with calls for the managers exit and generally was the most negative poster on the forum pre , during and post match ?

He's held it together while we occupied a top 6 place , that was it
I can be negative, one of those guys that would be annoyed if we lost to Bayern Munich, want my team winning every game. But at least back things up with arguments that make sense, I'm not understanding where he's going tonight.

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
 

Tommo1993

Well-Known Member
I can be negative, one of those guys that would be annoyed if we lost to Bayern Munich, want my team winning every game. But at least back things up with arguments that make sense, I'm not understanding where he's going tonight.

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk

I like you because your name is Tom x
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
In regards to goddens actual performance , felt like he won many balls back , was involved in plenty of build up play .. worked well with ohare and sheaf and scored a nice goal .

Nothing to moan about really , had we won that game 1 nil we'd be raving about the teams performance overall
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
Ngl it is partly wumming today and playing devils advocate. For what it’s worth I do think Kane is a decent player but just don’t get how Godden can be considered good enough, and Kane’s crosses be fantastic yet we never seem to score many from all the crosses put in

Since Viks goals have dried up we've been very reliant on Goddens.
I agree his overall contribution isnt as good.
 

Tommo1993

Well-Known Member
I predicted 2-0 loss, I thought Hudds were better than what they put on show today. As time was getting on though I was slowly beginning to seethe at the thought of leaving empty handed against poor time wasting hoofball merchants.
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
Thought Robins got it right today too , if we lost it would have been hard to put it on him ... as his players had enough chances to get something .

It was the only issue from an otherwise very impressive 90
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top