Israel - Palestinian Conflict (3 Viewers)

tisza

Well-Known Member
Who are the Muslims going to change their vote too though, Sunak has already fully aligned with Israel
Globally not all Muslims pro-Palestinian. Still factionalism. Not sure it's a voter issue in UK
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
even looking at it from a purely political angle what you are suggesting is political suicide

Starmer would be the only western leader or would be leader to take that stance. He’d be targeted as anti semetic and Corbyn mark 2
He would sell anyone down the river to get elected in this country never mind elsewhere.
 

duffer

Well-Known Member
I agree. I think if there hadn't been pressure behind the scenes Israel would have invaded Gaza and the West Bank by now and possibly made a preemptive strike at Hezbollah. But no Western leader can say this publicly.

I'm not saying you're wrong, but can I offer a possible alternative theory:

Might it suit Israel to delay the ground war whilst they're grinding down any military opposition via endless airstrikes, and simultaneously pressuring an entire population into abandoning their homes? In effect, killing and displacing lots of Palestinians without any great risk to their own forces.

Just to add, I don't think it would necessarily favour Israel to fight on two or even three fronts - the West Bank and Lebanon (Hezbollah) getting involved might not suit them right now.

Again, just mho all this. All I know for sure is that a lot of innocent men, women and children are suffering horribly, and it's going to get worse.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
They’ll avoid a ground war as much as possible. No one wants to go into urban territory with a hostile populous and a group that’s been planning for decades and has thousands of miles of tunnels. I also suspect that would be the trigger for Iran and the like to get involved.
 
D

Deleted member 9744

Guest
I'm not saying you're wrong, but can I offer a possible alternative theory:

Might it suit Israel to delay the ground war whilst they're grinding down any military opposition via endless airstrikes, and simultaneously pressuring an entire population into abandoning their homes? In effect, killing and displacing lots of Palestinians without any great risk to their own forces.

Just to add, I don't think it would necessarily favour Israel to fight on two or even three fronts - the West Bank and Lebanon (Hezbollah) getting involved might not suit them right now.

Again, just mho all this. All I know for sure is that a lot of innocent men, women and children are suffering horribly, and it's going to get worse.
There's no way of us knowing for sure either way, but I am pretty sure the US and the West generally do not want a major regional conflict, which a ground invasion of Gaza would almost certainly bring. This even risks uniting Iran and Saudi Arabia, which the US has been desperately trying to avoid for decades. We also have the Iranians and Hamas holding joint talks in Russia so the stakes are even higher, although in reality I can't see Russia wanting to get involved yet at least.

A massive Middle East conflict pitting most of the Arab states against Israel is absolutely in no one's interests, least if all Israel. However, Netanyahu is maybe just foolish enough to go ahead regardless. I would be amazed if the West was not trying desperately to restrain him.

On Hezbollah and the West Bank Israel will not feel constrained because of their military capacity and I suspect their calculation is they need pre emptive action. If they leave it these two could explode if the situationgets much worse in Gaza..
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Qatar negotiators are saying that they can organise the return of all hostages in return for a ceasefire. Hamas has also just released a statement saying that no more hostages will be returned without a ceasefire. Don’t hold your breath waiting for Israel to agree to it.
 

duffer

Well-Known Member
From Steve Reed, Labour shadow Environment Secretary....

Asked if Labour’s stance on the war will have an electoral impact, Reed added:

I think [it] won’t … and the reason I think that is in politics, you should do the right thing, not the electorally expedient thing.

I'm really sorry, but that's hypocrisy writ large. Large enough to be visible from the moon in fact.

Labour's stance on this (as with many other things) is entirely about electoral expedience.

If there was a choice between doing the right thing and getting another bunch of votes, I'm pretty sure I know which one Starmer would choose.

(Source below)

 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
View attachment 32219
Just to trivialise things, Celtic match last night.
and? Celtic have had a long history of supporting the Palestinian people

It is also pretty offensive to equate support of Palestinian people and their right to live a peaceful life in an unoccupied homeland with supporting the actions of terrorists like hamas
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
and? Celtic have had a long history of supporting the Palestinian people

It is also pretty offensive to equate support of Palestinian people and their right to live a peaceful life in an unoccupied homeland with supporting the actions of terrorists like hamas
I don’t think anyone did make that equation tbf, not on here at least

Is the sincere concern for the Palestinian cause really that widespread among Glaswegian Celtic fans? I know there’s a historic link between Irish and Palestinian activists, but this level of support at a Celtic game is surprising to me.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
I don’t think anyone did make that equation tbf, not on here at least

Is the sincere concern for the Palestinian cause really that widespread among Glaswegian Celtic fans? I know there’s a historic link between Irish and Palestinian activists, but this level of support at a Celtic game is surprising to me.
the flags are there most games, that is a close up tight photo of the green brigade section who usually have these flags, if you zoom out them you would see that they are absent from the rest of the stadium in the most.

it's like deciding all cov fans are one thing based on a close up photo of block 15
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
the flags are there most games, that is a close up tight photo of the green brigade section who usually have these flags, if you zoom out them you would see that they are absent from the rest of the stadium in the most.

it's like deciding all cov fans are one thing based on a close up photo of block 15
Well this is kind of what I’m getting at - is it a genuine concern among Celtic fans more broadly, or just a signifier of identity among a certain group of them?
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
Wish we could not take sides as a country
Should be so easy to say we’re on the side of a ceasefire and two state solution

Don’t we as a country actively support a two state solution already ?

The publicly calling for ceasefire point has been discussed. I’d imagine it’s something encouraged privately but won’t be said in public. What I am surprised about is maybe us/western governments not being more explicit saying whilst we support Israel’s right to defend itself, we hope and expect that every effort is taken to minimise civilian casualties and in allowing for humanitarian aid to get where it needs to

Let’s be honest though, it’s all kind of irrelevant what we or even the EU say, only US could actively push Israel into a different stance
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Just saw a report that almost 3000 Palestinian children have been killed now with over 800 missing. How much longer can this be allowed to go on by the west under the guise that Israel has the right to defend itself.
 

duffer

Well-Known Member
Don’t we as a country actively support a two state solution already ?

The publicly calling for ceasefire point has been discussed. I’d imagine it’s something encouraged privately but won’t be said in public. What I am surprised about is maybe us/western governments not being more explicit saying whilst we support Israel’s right to defend itself, we hope and expect that every effort is taken to minimise civilian casualties and in allowing for humanitarian aid to get where it needs to

Let’s be honest though, it’s all kind of irrelevant what we or even the EU say, only US could actively push Israel into a different stance

Politely disagree. If we "actively" supported a two state solution, Steve, I don't think we'd be pushing the anti-BDS bill through the commons shortly.

The Tories don't want to move us away from the US or Israel, and Labour don't want to move away from the Tories.

In the meantime, the majority of the country supports a ceasefire, it seems...


 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
Politely disagree. If we "actively" supported a two state solution, Steve, I don't think we'd be pushing the anti-BDS bill through the commons shortly.

The Tories don't want to move us away from the US or Israel, and Labour don't want to move away from the Tories.

In the meantime, the majority of the country supports a ceasefire, it seems...



Im only basing it on what I’ve heard and read. Just googled it’s and all over government website. One example


Trying to stop public bodies boycotting Israel doesn’t change our stated position.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
In an ideal world
Ours verdict interesting, USA unsurprising, Russia and Ukraine also interesting View attachment 32222

Looking at it almost all western nations that aren’t gung ho Israel supporters abstained.

The Yanks seem to be tying Israel and Ukraine support together so I imagine that puts them in a bind.

It amazing the political shield around anyone telling Israel to chill out a bit.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
I'm really uncomfortable about what Israel are doing. What they suffered with those Hamas terrorist attacks was horrendous and those responsible need to be held accountable for the crimes they have committed. However, Israel's indiscriminate bombing, withholding food and water, and now ground invasion is causing thousands of innocent Palestinian people to be killed.

How many deaths is acceptable? There been an estimated 9600 civilians killed in Ukraine since Feb 2022, there have already been an estimated 7,400 Palestinians and 1,400 Israeli's killed in the last 3 weeks alone.

There needs to be a cease fire.

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
 

Como

Well-Known Member
With such massive support from the United Nations now must be the time to send in UN Peacekeepers, a War Crimes Tribunal, Humanitarian support etc. I cannot see Israel/US being able to object.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
With such massive support from the United Nations now must be the time to send in UN Peacekeepers, a War Crimes Tribunal, Humanitarian support etc. I cannot see Israel/US being able to object.
Israel still seem very angry and vengeful, so I am not so sure on that to be honest. Not on reading the below article.

They really, really should though. Gaza ha been brought to it's knees. Humanitarian aid needs bringing in now as a matter of the most greatest urgency

BBC News - Israel angrily dismisses UN truce resolution on Gaza

They merely seem to just telling the people of Gaza to move further south
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
I've watched some pretty bad videos tonight , I'm not sure what Israel is doing is at all justifiable at this point ...I was on their side to begin with but what they're doing now is pretty horrific .

Feels like gaza will be swallowed up into Israel really doesn't it
It's what you wanted to happen is it not?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top