“Playing him on” is not debatable as he was blocking a shot on goalHe's clearly offside. Debatable that the defender is playing him on, but even if he is, he's the only 1 player that is as he's further advanced than the keeper. I love how passionately people wear their sky blue tinted glasses, but I've said it a thousand times and it's a FACT, he was offside. Man utd at Wembley on the other hand
Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk
Haji Wright was off side v Burnley, Ref and Linesman, mainly the Linesman dropped a clanger.
1 in 5He doesn't, but penalties are often saved or missed (there is a difference in my book) and not a given goal, just a given opportunity.
A keeper is nearly always on the goal line unless coming out to claim the ball, in which case the ball has already been played, so I think maybe the linesman was just concentrating on the last defender and mentally ignored the keeper.Haji Wright was off side v Burnley, Ref and Linesman, mainly the Linesman dropped a clanger.
A keeper is nearly always on the goal line unless coming out to claim the ball, in which case the ball has already been played, so I think maybe the linesman was just concentrating on the last defender and mentally ignored the keeper.
You can see from post 100 that it's poor defending because the keeper is trying to cover off a shot from EMC, and also the cross to Allen (I think it is). At this stage Haji is not a threat unless he is played on (which he was). Looking at it on stills is one thing but in real time ....
.... ermA keeper is nearly always on the goal line unless coming out to claim the ball
Haji Wright was off side v Burnley, Ref and Linesman, mainly the Linesman dropped a clanger.
Depends on the wording of the criticism.
Ok what words would you use to describe his performance?
WhoBefore I retired at work the saying was you may not respect the person but respect the position they hold.
It is not a criticism of the way FL reacted. More a criticism of how our fans have reacted to FL's red. FL will have a choice, plead his innocence or take it on the chin. I suspect he will take it on the chin.
The ref didn't manage the game well and it unravelled for him. But it was a difficult game to manage as both teams were at it. OK Burnley maybe more than us. He made mistakes but also got a lot right, although both teams and fans will contest that.
One of the problems was both teams were doing stuff off the ball
We committed lots of fouls
Fouls are fine and part of the gameWe committed lots of fouls
Has there been any official statement on what ban Lampard has?
Can we appeal it like a player one?
On what grounds? “The ref was actually shit so it doesn’t count”?
Well I’d expect a red if he used threatening or abusive language. If he were simply just critical, a yellow perhaps but a red is OTT.On what grounds? “The ref was actually shit so it doesn’t count”?
Cov Telegraph said tonights match only.Has there been any official statement on what ban Lampard has?
Should try it, ask for a hearing where they have to explain how what Lampard said wasn't true!On what grounds? “The ref was actually shit so it doesn’t count”?
Were you on Lampard's shoulder, you haven't got a clue what was said.Shouldn't get in trouble for being honest and telling the truth.
If an outfield player stops a shot it is a block and not a save. If a GK stops a shot it is a save.Well we'll have to agree to differ, but politely, you're completely ignoring the control element here.
Their player isn't in any position to be in control of the ball, and that's the key part of deliberately played. It's an attempted save, there's nothing else he can do from the position he's in, he's just trying to stop the ball from going in the goal which is the definition of a save.
If the goalie goes to make a save in exactly that position, and the ball bounces off him and to Wright in an offside position, is Wright offside?
That's exactly what happens on a regular basis with players following in on shots, and of course it's almost always offside.
Anyhow - we differ, and it's not a big deal. Fair enough, I'll shut up now.
Do you know the rules ? Asking for a RefIf an outfield player stops a shot it is a block and not a save. If a GK stops a shot it is a save.
If a defender blocks a shot and intended to block a shot and then the ball goes to an opponent the player isn't offside. It is down to how the ref interprets the play.
Yes. We went through the same thing a couple of weeks ago. Some people just don't understand the rule.Do you know the rules ? Asking for a Ref
Yes. We went through the same thing a couple of weeks ago. Some people just don't understand the rule.
Telegraph article confirming Lampard’s not appealing it and he expects to be out for Hull.
No, not allowed in the technical area at all (not sure if allowed in the stadium).Wants to be available for West Brom I guess. Can he still participate in pre match and half time team talks?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What's prohibited during a touchline ban:No, not allowed in the technical area at all (not sure if allowed in the stadium).
Oh fairs I stand corrected thanks for that.What's prohibited during a touchline ban:
Presence in the technical area: The coach cannot be in or behind the dugout, the area where the team staff is typically located.
Communication on the field: The coach cannot shout instructions or make contact with players on the field.
Touchline and field access: The coach is prohibited from being on the touchline or the field before, during, or after the match.
Contact with match officials: The coach cannot attempt to contact any match officials, including referees, assessors, or match delegates.
What is permitted during a touchline ban:
Communication from the dug-out: The coach can communicate with others in the dugout using electronic devices like radios or mobile phones.
Access to changing rooms: The coach can enter the changing rooms before kick-off, at half-time, and after the match.
Press conferences: The coach can participate in pre-match and post-match press interviews.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?