Many judged Gyokeres by this point, some clowns even saying they preferred Biamou
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
@skybluecam this is one for youIf we’d have kept to the “common sense model” (and we can brand it however we like, Brentford or Brighton but just common sense:
Buy young players with proven potential at either the league below or fringe prem or cheaper euro leagues for up to £2m
Have a couple of older heads in midfield and defence)
Then I think most on here could have seen the strategy and would be less concerned.
We’ve had a £35m windfall that we’ve not ever had before and two players in particular don’t fit the “common sense” model.
With the Wright and Kitching money we could have easily got 6 decent players in and had a much deeper squad.
I think that sums up the mood of the fans. Maybe King too.
If we’d have kept to the “common sense model” (and we can brand it however we like, Brentford or Brighton but just common sense:
Buy young players with proven potential at either the league below or fringe prem or cheaper euro leagues for up to £2m
Have a couple of older heads in midfield and defence)
Then I think most on here could have seen the strategy and would be less concerned.
We’ve had a £35m windfall that we’ve not ever had before and two players in particular don’t fit the “common sense” model.
With the Wright and Kitching money we could have easily got 6 decent players in and had a much deeper squad.
I think that sums up the mood of the fans. Maybe King too.
Can speak English and can play in the Championship without taking 6 months to settle.'Proven potential', what does that even mean? Its an oxymoron surely?
The problem is that selling clubs know when a club has received a large windfall and will demand more in fees, as has happened with Kitching. I think he'll turn into a good player at this level - hopefully, the £4m is dependent on promotion, so then it wouldn't matter too much.If we’d have kept to the “common sense model” (and we can brand it however we like, Brentford or Brighton but just common sense:
Buy young players with proven potential at either the league below or fringe prem or cheaper euro leagues for up to £2m
Have a couple of older heads in midfield and defence)
Then I think most on here could have seen the strategy and would be less concerned.
We’ve had a £35m windfall that we’ve not ever had before and two players in particular don’t fit the “common sense” model.
With the Wright and Kitching money we could have easily got 6 decent players in and had a much deeper squad.
I think that sums up the mood of the fans. Maybe King too.
The obvious example is Latibeaudiere played in this division (proven) and 23 years old (potential to improve and sell on). Did not cost millions.'Proven potential', what does that even mean? Its an oxymoron surely?
Or just a regular moron?'Proven potential', what does that even mean? Its an oxymoron surely?
“Common sense” signings:
Latibeaudiere
JDS (not expensive, calculated risk, not old)
So-so:
Thomas right age but not really played at a decent level much.
Tats, right age, international, but relegated and maybe lightweight for the Champ
Simms, right age, proven at level but could cost £8m so potentially expensive.
Collins, at the point of signing we hadn’t offloaded Moore and had the golden glove winner as first choice. Biggish fee for a backup keeper when there are plenty of options for emergency loans from the Prem in times of injury crisis.
MVE, age, played at decent level, big fee though - similar to Simms.
Not common sense:
Wright - could have got 3 decent strikers in for his fee.
Kitching - 2 decent midfielders
Kitching will turn out to the best buy of the SummerGive me strength
We signed centre backs and full backs that can play wing back, it's hardly some specialist positionSpent all summer recruiting for 3 at the back with wing backs, knowing that it's a declining trend hardly used by any other clubs. I wouldn't let them spend another penny. It's farcical.
Dunno but under this recruitment team he’s bound to be an expensive flopHave we had any threads of possibility, who MR could (conceivably) be looking to sign in January?
Have we had any threads of possibility, who MR could (conceivably) be looking to sign in January?
Well if they've had the deposit?Callum Styles?
Another titch.Callum Styles?
You would have thought with the money we spent the players we bought in particularly the two striker's coulf control a ball, hold it up and bring others into play and be strong enough to retain possession! I only ask that the players have a basic skill set reallyIf we’d have kept to the “common sense model” (and we can brand it however we like, Brentford or Brighton but just common sense:
Buy young players with proven potential at either the league below or fringe prem or cheaper euro leagues for up to £2m
Have a couple of older heads in midfield and defence)
Then I think most on here could have seen the strategy and would be less concerned.
We’ve had a £35m windfall that we’ve not ever had before and two players in particular don’t fit the “common sense” model.
With the Wright and Kitching money we could have easily got 6 decent players in and had a much deeper squad.
I think that sums up the mood of the fans. Maybe King too.
If we’d have kept to the “common sense model” (and we can brand it however we like, Brentford or Brighton but just common sense:
Buy young players with proven potential at either the league below or fringe prem or cheaper euro leagues for up to £2m
Have a couple of older heads in midfield and defence)
Then I think most on here could have seen the strategy and would be less concerned.
We’ve had a £35m windfall that we’ve not ever had before and two players in particular don’t fit the “common sense” model.
With the Wright and Kitching money we could have easily got 6 decent players in and had a much deeper squad.
I think that sums up the mood of the fans. Maybe King too.
Kitching will turn out to the best buy of the Summer
Where would you see Sakamoto going for us to make a significant profit on him?Yeah fair, buying Binks for £1-2m for example seems more logical than us paying nearly £5m for Kitching but time will tell, I think they wanted a ‘try before you buy’ with Binks but we should have agreed a fee first with them.
Players like Miles Leaburn over Wright would have also fit that model. Sakamoto seems the right sort of £1m risk that could pay off in that Brentford model style.
If we signed Binks and Leaburn for example for a total of £5m let’s say for arguements sake, we would have saved £7-8m (excluding the add ons which would be on top of that) for other signings around that price.
Never would I have thought I’d see us spending £4.5m and £7.7m on players and I guess if they turned out to be light years above everybody else we’d be dancing for joy but I guess so far Kitching doesn’t seem that much better than Binks and Wright doesn’t seem to have that killer instinct in him when he plays
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Manchester City.Where would you see Sakamoto going for us to make a significant profit on him?
Yep. DK has to let MR bring in that midfielder to keep the rebuild on some sort of track. Don't think he'll let him do much more though.At the same time, it’s painfully obvious we need better in midfield.
It utterly mad we didn't get a replacement and/or back up in the summer. We were very lucky that Hamer stayed fit last season was a bit mental not to be chasing a back up even if we did believe he was staying.
Where would you see Sakamoto going for us to make a significant profit on him?
Brentford don’t sell every single player. It’s a low fee low risk signing but could turn out to be a solid player for us.
Given we have decent attacking statistics (in terms of xG) and our front three are all in the top 10 for big chances missed, I don't think you can let the strikers off quite so easily to be honest.The lack of creative playmaker is the huge gap we need to address.
Those writing players off - predominantly the front two - clearly miss that context. Striker’s performances are reliant on the service they receive, and so far this year we’ve lacked a decisive final ball and been asking Sheaf to play the ‘Hamer’ role.
The lack of creative playmaker is the huge gap we need to address.
Those writing players off - predominantly the front two - clearly miss that context. Striker’s performances are reliant on the service they receive, and so far this year we’ve lacked a decisive final ball and been asking Sheaf to play the ‘Hamer’ role.
For everyone else we’ve signed, appreciate the jury is still out for some, but a constant change in team selection, followed by tweaks, and now a wholesale change, to tactics isn’t exactly the environment to gain momentum, confidence or form.
Let’s wait and see how things play out.
And stop the constant negativity.
If you were present for the L1 relegation season, then this is a breeze. Yea we have money now, it just means stakes and expectations are higher - all other factors remain.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?