Saying I'm sorry shouldn't be a get out of jail card though. At some point you gotta learn and change the way you post in future.Fair play to you as well mate , you always concede when you've made a bad call
I’d tend to disagree, a Hamer type player for instance could very much slip into that role. More box to boxWhen playing 4 at the back we do.
The third midfielder/AM is the creative one.
Saying I'm sorry shouldn't be a get out of jail card though. At some point you gotta learn and change the way you post in future.
Like I could say robins is a shit c**t manager and we are going down. Not rly ok to say yeah fair play I got that wrong after and then next season say something ridiculous again.
Not aimed at saddle brains can I point out!
I get that but for me there’s nothing more infuriating than our fans and some posters on here making a judgement call on a player and stubbornly sticking by it even if the player performs well . Makes them look rather stupidSaying I'm sorry shouldn't be a get out of jail card though. At some point you gotta learn and change the way you post in future.
Like I could say robins is a shit c**t manager and we are going down. Not rly ok to say yeah fair play I got that wrong after and then next season say something ridiculous again.
Not aimed at saddle brains can I point out!
You obviously have never been on Mumsnet. It's quite savage at times.It’s a football forum and not a Womens Institute meeting or mumsnet so anything Is fair game
I get that but for me there’s nothing more infuriating than our fans and some posters on here making a judgement call on a player and stubbornly sticking by it even if the player performs well . Makes them look rather stupid
And that was just from the moderatorsYou obviously have never been on Mumsnet. It's quite savage at times.
I can't comment on the Women's Institute, because I quit years ago due to the overt racism and threats of violence.
Like?Or running to the hills when upgrades and brilliant signings prove to be rather shit
Great he's so versatile but I think having him working in the canteen would be a bit of a waste.I'd like him back. He's such a utility player and can fill many rolls.
Besides, it's a fucking batch!Great he's so versatile but I think having him working in the canteen would be a bit of a waste.
In Kent, everyone just thinks I am weird.Besides, it's a fucking batch!
Not just in Kent, Otis!In Kent, everyone just thinks I am weird.
Tend to agree with you. Best not to get as wound up as those posting the more outlandish views. A few exchanges are very entertaining; most not.It’s a football forum and not a Womens Institute meeting or mumsnet so anything Is fair game
This is the sort of exchange that keeps me coming back. Keep up the good work, people.Great he's so versatile but I think having him working in the canteen would be a bit of a waste.
@Greggs should be in for him then.I'd like him back. He's such a utility player and can fill many rolls.
It’s a football forum and not a Womens Institute meeting or mumsnet so anything Is fair game
I know. That's what I said.Have you been on MumsNet??
Time will tell, but the only new player that would probably be picked ahead of any of last years team would be Van Ewijk.
My position all along, we're missing something in the middle but I do think we've got a decent collection of players. How the manager has been setting them up however...The recruitment team have been getting some shit this season, but I still maintain some of these players are actually a lot better than they are given credit for.
More questions on the management for me. We effectively threw the game yesterday with how we set up.
and Collins. Cos he is being picked over last years player.
I think this is right and it is a real problem. We have loads of players on long contracts and most people see this as a positive but I don't get it when the team is actually weaker.Time will tell, but the only new player that would probably be picked ahead of any of last years team would be Van Ewijk.
They’ll get better over time and we will be able to just tinker here and thereI think this is right and it is a real problem. We have loads of players on long contracts and most people see this as a positive but I don't get it when the team is actually weaker.
There's no guarantee they will and it gets harder for them to develop in a struggling team.They’ll get better over time and we will be able to just tinker here and there
I think we’ve got a decent group, albeit we need some additions in crucial areas
for me the management team are underperforming with the squad we’ve got
We don't need any more new players to try and integrate, it's not the answer aside from a midfielderThere's no guarantee they will and it gets harder for them to develop in a struggling team.
We need some clever signings in January in my view.
Think another wide forward too, but agreeWe don't need any more new players to try and integrate, it's not the answer aside from a midfielder
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
Next season as well, they won't be leaving unlike the loanees (some might see this as a bad thing!) so we can build on top of it, rather than constant firefighting.Did people really expect us to lost Vik and Gus and get better? Comparing McNally and Doyle is a bit silly cos we couldn’t afford them either.
We’ve improved the depth.
Walker -> Simms
Maguire -> Sakamoto
Rose -> Latibeaudiere
JWE -> Dasilva
Just looking at the first XI when we lost probably £50m of talent in four players is ridiculous. The aim was to give us a better match day squad and we clearly do. Who could we have brought on last season similar to O’Hare, Godden, Saka and Simms?
We need some experience and someone to lead the side and higher quality in forward positions.We don't need any more new players to try and integrate, it's not the answer aside from a midfielder
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
We shouldn’t need higher quality after spending 10 plus on strikersWe need some experience and someone to lead the side and higher quality in forward positions.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?