I don’t disagree, it’s a bad look and probably done irreparable damage in terms of his political career. However there’s also been some intentionally confusing and vague commentary to make it sound as morally as bad as possible. I don’t know if it’s bad or not and am unlikely to unless they disclose all their tax affairs
incorrectIt isn't the point at all that she pays tax at all its that she pays nothing here.
Exactly. God forbid a but of critical thinking though…anything that’s not frothing at the mouth screaming Tory corruption (which there is plenty of by the way) is just not okay. MentalIt is relevant though. I don’t agree with the domicile rules but if (and I still don’t know if this is the case) she has say paid dividend tax to India as an Indian citizen from money derived from an Indian company, it is very different from paying limited/no tax ie in a tax haven. I don’t know how much tax she pays here but it’s said she pays tax on any income earned in the UK so I don’t think it’s nothing, although I’d imagine main income is from Indian company
You do realise someone in his own party has instigated this?
What ever its designed to do, it was done by one of his colleagues.
Yeah, could even be Johnson although apparently he didn’t know if she was non dom….hmmmm, only a handful of people did. Even rumours of treasury leak. My point is that there is a wide moral scale where this could sit yet many media and commentators are presenting it’s sitting at the worse end of the scale even though they know it might not be
It was a story in private eye 12 months ago
Didnt know that, did it get leaked to them or was it their own investigations ?
It’s 6.7p each lol, where are you buying your mealsI don’t know why we are all worried - it’s only £4.5m overall and I’m sure we can all miss a meal or two so the poor love isn’t inconvenienced any further.
After all, she is a superior human being with all that money.
You’re that intent on defending it you worked out the exact cost per individual??It’s 6.7p each lol, where are you buying your meals
Further to this, Sajid Javed has admitted to non dom status while he was a banker. I don't necessarily approve, but nor do I think that's an issue, as he was playing the rules as set out by the treasury...It is. My main issue is that it's the chancellor's job to maximise the tax take for this country, and he and his family seem to be determined to do the opposite. It's somewhat different to an individual taking the rules to the limit, after all.
Wouldn't even be so bad if he was health secretary or something. Chancellor kind of rubs it in!
Go over Rishi
He should take pictures and complain to the police.They can’t get on with the noisy party animal neighbours.
Has the poor love got a tiny bit of criticism and can't hack it.
Given who this is from I assume that he actually has a source. Guess it shows what his priorities are.
At this rate the cabinet and their spouses could solve the national debt simply by paying taxes like the plebs.Another one.
Open season on Tory tax affairs now.
That's the problem with deciding to rat out one person, it leads to unexpected attention on them all
Given who this is from I assume that he actually has a source. Guess it shows what his priorities are.
Yeh it’s super hard maths mate took agesYou’re that intent on defending it you worked out the exact cost per individual??
Yeh it’s super hard maths mate took ages
let me know if you’ve got a few hours I’ll talk you through it
Are you an Irish citizen, own an Irish company and receive dividends in Ireland and pay tax to the Irish government? If so probablyGod me dad was Irish .
Should I have gone Non Dom ??
Given who this is from I assume that he actually has a source. Guess it shows what his priorities are.
Are you an Irish citizen, own an Irish company and receive dividends in Ireland and pay tax to the Irish government? If so probably
Cheers for the kind offer but I think I’ll manage.Yeh it’s super hard maths mate took ages
let me know if you’ve got a few hours I’ll talk you through it
I honestly have no problem with that. He was playing the rules as set out, even if I don't agree with them. The difference is, he wasn't setting the rules while doing so, and changed his status when he was in a position to.Another one.
Open season on Tory tax affairs now.
That's the problem with deciding to rat out one person, it leads to unexpected attention on them all
Another one.
Open season on Tory tax affairs now.
That's the problem with deciding to rat out one person, it leads to unexpected attention on them all
I honestly have no problem with that. He was playing the rules as set out, even if I don't agree with them. The difference is, he wasn't setting the rules while doing so, and changed his status when he was in a position to.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?