-----------------RCC
Lorentzson Stephens Martin stokes
-----------------Vincelot
-----------rose-----------fleck
-----------------Maddison (Cole can't play twice in a a week)
-----------tudguy--------Armstrong
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Too narrow imo, no point having 2 up front when you're so narrow.
Lorentzson is an attacking fullback, always wanting to get forwards, so you should get some width there.Yeah it is a bit too narrow, especially as we don't have a Cyrus Christie not sure what the answer is, only Murphy and hunt are real wide men, and hunt shouldn't be anywhere near the subs bench let alone start. A lot are sticking rose out wide in their formations, but he is a centre mid, you're back to the 3 of Maddison, Cole, Murphy and lamieres and you're still very narrow.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Lorentzson when he got forward on Saturday was very rarely given the ball. On a couple of occasions he was in acres of space but ignored. We needed to use him to get behind their defence
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Lorentzson when he got forward on Saturday was very rarely given the ball. On a couple of occasions he was in acres of space but ignored. We needed to use him to get behind their defence
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What did he do wrong?Lorentzen was pants on Saturday. I hope that is down to match fitness.
I can see us getting a credible draw in the circumstances but i feel there must be more if we really mean to play ourselves out of this whole we have dug ourselves. Didn't think a prolonged break helped us out Saturday either, we lose any cohesion we had so playing again in a night match so soon may just be the tonic.
Lorentzen was pants on Saturday. I hope that is down to match fitness.
I can see us getting a credible draw in the circumstances but i feel there must be more if we really mean to play ourselves out of this whole we have dug ourselves. Didn't think a prolonged break helped us out Saturday either, we lose any cohesion we had so playing again in a night match so soon may just be the tonic.
Lorentzen was pants on Saturday. I hope that is down to match fitness.
I can see us getting a credible draw in the circumstances but i feel there must be more if we really mean to play ourselves out of this whole we have dug ourselves. Didn't think a prolonged break helped us out Saturday either, we lose any cohesion we had so playing again in a night match so soon may just be the tonic.
We are due a win, 5-0 at Crewe followed by 3 defeats, 6-0 against Bury followed by 3 defeats so it's a 7-0 win for me.
Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk
If Cole can play I'd swap him for MadisonCook
Lorentszon
Stephens
Martin
Stokes
Vincelot
Fleck
Rose
Maddison
Armstrong
Henderson
----------------------RCC------------------
Lorenztson---Martin----Stephens ---Stokes
Lameires ---vincelot -----Rose----Murphy
---------Henderson-- Armstrong---------
Bench: Addai, Ramage, Ricketts, Fleck, Hunt/Cole, Maddison, Tudgay
5 changes for me with a lack of confidence in some players, and a switch to 442 and style of play to accommodate the in coming players to best advantage.
Lameires deserves to start again as he can feed AA very well, Murphy will most likely start as Joe Cole tends not to play twice in a week tho did come off early on so will feature on the bench I predict.
Ricketts should be dropped for Lorenztson and martins brought in. Henderson drafted in to be the brute force up front for AA to feed off.
But played some great balls to split the defenceLameires was very poor on Saturday, light weight on the ball and pass completion must have been below 20%, I want him to do well but has yet to convince me, agree with Ricketts, but unless Martin is fit it's down to bare bones in defence so Ricketts will play at cb.