RegTheDonk
Well-Known Member
But they Do sell the stock. They still make money. They don't flush it down the bog to they? In fact, would be nice to want something without being told we have to order it in. Can't see your point.
But they Do sell the stock. They still make money. They don't flush it down the bog to they? In fact, would be nice to want something without being told we have to order it in. Can't see your point.The effect Brexit stockpiling is having on the economy
Short term. Now they have to sell the stock to reduce their borrowing.. until the next time..
The combination of labour and liberal or “other” parties in England has always been around the same percentage since the war. The Tory vote in most elections has a consistent share with a couple of exceptions
But they Do sell the stock. They still make money. They don't flush it down the bog to they? In fact, would be nice to want something without being told we have to order it in. Can't see your point.
I have nothing to say but just wanted to be part of the 1000th page
Woah, get in! What do I win...a holiday in Greece?I have nothing to say but just wanted to be part of the 1000th page
But they Do sell the stock. They still make money. They don't flush it down the bog to they? In fact, would be nice to want something without being told we have to order it in. Can't see your point.
Yes, if flows from my bank into the wifes purse.Who bank rolls it? Have you heard the term cash flow before?
Do I need to quote what you said again?I didn't quote an opinion poll, use of 42.4% for the Tories and 40% for Labour is the 2017 General Election result, which again is not an opinion poll. There's not really much you can argue with here.
I may as well quote polls since you insist I have, and the polls show a drop in support for Lab/Con and have them pretty even. So your argument that Labour has little/no support outside of its hardcore support is not backed up by anything. Not by current opinion polls nor, more importantly, the last GE election.
Stupid me. Looked at this post and can't resist correcting false information.Yes. It does. Record employment when you count zero hours jobs and part time jobs.
Yes, if flows from my bank into the wifes purse.
Look, whoever bank rolls it will charge a sum. Whovever owns the warehouse will charge a sum. So sum ones cash flow is OK. One business pays out, but two make money for providing a service. I thought businesses' were losing millions because of Brixit? Some obviously seem to be profiting.
What was peculiar?Why have you looped Labour, Lib and 'other' parties in together? I may as well as reply 'if you combine every party's vote share, you reach 100% of the vote'. It's stating the obvious, frankly.
Before 2017, the last time the Tories won more than 40% in a GE was in 1992, and you have to go back to 1983 find a better vote share than 2017. The result from 2017 was very peculiar.
Are you just another account from one of those who keep trying to take the piss out if me that I am now ignoring? Because you have been no better the last day. Everyone can and has read what you said.
Or are you saying Corbyn is good for Labour and they don't have anyone better?
Do I need to quote what you said again?
Why did you say Labour had 40% support, mention a poll and that you don't exactly trust polls in the same sentence then try to say you meant in the last GE?
Are you just another account from one of those who keep trying to take the piss out if me that I am now ignoring? Because you have been no better the last day. Everyone can and has read what you said.
Tories will lose votes but Labour won't lose many at all. Labour doesn't have much more than the hard core Labour voters presently. Corbyn as leader hasn't got many floating voters on Labour's side. If he had Labour would be running away with it. But the longer this bullshit goes on for the more the Tory voters will desert them.
Not sure but individuals can work it out here: How much does your tax bill contribute to EU membership?
I obviously didn’t make anything up. Read what the people who made the comparison say. Nothing to do with me, but I base my opinion on such evidence based reports as opposed to „there are no down sides“ Brexiteer promises.
Not all economies are performing like Germany.
What was peculiar?
Shows you don't know as much as you think you do. UKIP were not needed anymore. We were leaving the EU. So these people needed someone to vote for. And the Lib Dems were not going to get the vote of millions of people for jumping into bed with the Tories. So many more votes were available. Instead of having 3 bigger parties and UKIP it was suddenly down to Labour, the Tories and the also rans.
Things have now changed with Brexit. The Tories have May and Labour has Corbyn.
Or are you saying Corbyn is good for Labour and they don't have anyone better?
Why have you looped Labour, Lib and 'other' parties in together? I may as well as reply 'if you combine every party's vote share, you reach 100% of the vote'. It's stating the obvious, frankly.
Before 2017, the last time the Tories won more than 40% in a GE was in 1992, and you have to go back to 1983 find a better vote share than 2017. The result from 2017 was very peculiar.
I said a few posts ago that the result for the tories was virtually unprecedented - you disputed it - now it’s peculiar
Anyone can get this data from wiki - I hope your “essay” was better than these rather lame efforts
Definition of unprecedented: ‘never done or known before’.
In my lifetime Blair won 43.2% of the vote. Thatcher won with 43% and 42% of the vote. So 3 prime ministers in your lifetime have achieved that figure. Another 2 or 3 elections from Margaret Thatcher have had the winning party poll more than or equal to 40%.
It’s unprecedented as it didn’t deliver a majority and created an impression of an unpopular government
Are you this dull in real life
Too right it doesn't.Which is what I said, so we’re in agreement.
The Government lost seats, and the consensus is that May’s campaign in 2017 was one of the worst in modern history. I’m sure you expected Labour to be ‘wiped off’ of the map.
Or if you want to go off just %s would you say Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour Party was more popular than David Cameron? No, you wouldn’t. I’m sure you’ll agree with me that is a stupid thing to say. Just looking at the % doesn’t give you context.
You lied end of
Me too.I have nothing to say but just wanted to be part of the 1000th page
Stupid me. Looked at this post and can't resist correcting false information.
Zero hour jobs have been reduced at the same time record employment has gone higher. But you will think of a way to twist it. You always do.
DamnI have nothing to say but just wanted to be part of the 1000th page
Well no Tony, actually it IS the point. The point I was reponding to was the suggestion this fiasco is costing companies billions. Some companies in this scenario will obviously be disadvantaged, but some obviously will proit. It won't be a disaster for every business. In fact, you're quids in if you make washers.That’s not the point. If you sell 1000 washers every month you buy a 1000 washers every month. You probably buy them on a 30 day end of month account. In other words let’s say for example you take delivery on the 1st of January you have until the end of February to pay that bill. In the same period you’ve sold them and probably collected the money enabling you to pay your bill, staff, business rates, utilities, rent etc etc. Now all off a sudden you have to order 6 months worth but you still only get 30 days end of month and you’re not going to sell them for 6 months. Do you A) pay your bill B) pay your staff C) pay your business rates D) pay your utilities E) pay rent? Maybe you borrow some money to pay all of them. Is that service A) free or B) an expense? Maybe you don’t have room at your premises to store them so you need to rent space in a warehouse somewhere. Is that service A) free or B) an expense?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?