Hard brexit. Which is not the manifesto May was elected on. She was elected on a manifesto of getting a deal. Labour also stood on a manifesto of getting a deal. Did any party actually stand on a manifesto of no deal and win a seat?
Both sides?Why did you laugh when it clearly is?
It’s about time you showed some of your self proclaimed ability to see both sides.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What kind of Brexit was voted for? I don't remember seeing hard or soft Brexit. Just yes or no.We have a representative democracy. It’s literally impossible for elected representatives to go against the will of the people.
If the will of the people was hard Brexit, May wouldn’t have lost her majority
What kind of Brexit was voted for? I don't remember seeing hard or soft Brexit. Just yes or no.
1, There are several ways that an early general election can be called. But they all depend on the situation.Lol G has claimed:
Of course you'll pick him up on these claims.
- There is only 1 way to achieve an early general election
- The Queen has no ability to stop proroguing of Parliament
- The Lords and monarch have no scrutiny over legislation from the Commons
- The Commons represents our democracy but Johnson is right to suspend it so he can force through Brexit
What kind of Brexit was voted for? I don't remember seeing hard or soft Brexit. Just yes or no.
How many times? Evidence? You have none. Because it was in or out. Full stop.How many times - the mandate was for a better deal than we have now.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
1, There are several ways that an early general election can be called. But they all depend on the situation.
What kind of Brexit was voted for? I don't remember seeing hard or soft Brexit. Just yes or no.
How many times? Evidence? You have none. Because it was in or out. Full stop.
I’m only quoting your own evidence. You presented it as fact not me. Did you actually read it past the headline? The devil is in the details and you seem to be lacking an eye for that. Go back and read your own evidence. Twice, at least. Then give it an hour or two to digest, then read again.
Yet you back those who are using processes to deny democracy. Then bleat about undemocratic decisions.Precedent is hardly relevant in unprecedented times. He is using one process to run down the clock and deny another.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
How many times? Evidence? You have none. Because it was in or out. Full stop.
So what was on your ballot paper?Neither major party ran on either in or out. Why are you making shit up like google doesn’t index back to 2017?
I don’t have to Tony but I will tweet Andrew and say you can confirm he is reading the legislation incorrectly - oh I’ll also tell him he was talking out his arse on the pork pie debate
So what was on your ballot paper?
Hard Brexit, soft Brexit, medium Brexit, any old Brexit and remain?
Lol G has claimed:
Of course you'll pick him up on these claims.
- There is only 1 way to achieve an early general election
- The Queen has no ability to stop proroguing of Parliament
- The Lords and monarch have no scrutiny over legislation from the Commons
- The Commons represents our democracy but Johnson is right to suspend it so he can force through Brexit
Yes it’s hilarious to see the dramatic change in the attitude of the EU leaders.
Six months ago, dealing with the cowering, feeble May, they had the UK exactly where they wanted us.
Pipsqueak politicians like Macron, Varadkar and Tusk knew that they could treat May with contempt and she’d still come back for more.
Now they see us confidently making preparations to leave in a couple of months regardless of them and engaged in talks with Trump and others.
Suddenly they look like the ones on the fringes.
The notion you want 500 years of sovereignty to be overwritten by the monarchy because you don’t like the government action is hilarious
There is only one way to achieve an election - not my problem Corbyn has no balls to get of his arse and try and force Johnson out is it
Yes it’s hilarious to see the dramatic change in the attitude of the EU leaders.
Six months ago, dealing with the cowering, feeble May, they had the UK exactly where they wanted us.
Pipsqueak politicians like Macron, Varadkar and Tusk knew that they could treat May with contempt and she’d still come back for more.
Now they see us confidently making preparations to leave in a couple of months regardless of them and engaged in talks with Trump and others.
Suddenly they look like the ones on the fringes.
Yet you back those who are using processes to deny democracy. Then bleat about undemocratic decisions.
And this is the problem that I have. I want to see a democratic decision to be kept to. Because if it doesn't happen we would end up like the EU and push through whatever they want. We could be saved by another referendum. But to have one would also be undemocratic.
Yet you back those who are using processes to deny democracy. Then bleat about undemocratic decisions.
And this is the problem that I have. I want to see a democratic decision to be kept to. Because if it doesn't happen we would end up like the EU and push through whatever they want. We could be saved by another referendum. But to have one would also be undemocratic.
Yep. May negotiated that and the ERG voted it down. What’s your point?
Yet you back those who are using processes to deny democracy. Then bleat about undemocratic decisions.
And this is the problem that I have. I want to see a democratic decision to be kept to. Because if it doesn't happen we would end up like the EU and push through whatever they want. We could be saved by another referendum. But to have one would also be undemocratic.
It’s not denying democracy. It’s denying a twisted interpretation of a tampered referendum.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So what was on your ballot paper?
Hard Brexit, soft Brexit, medium Brexit, any old Brexit and remain?
Do you really think this argument has any weight whatsoever?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
How many times? Evidence? You have none. Because it was in or out. Full stop.
A tampered referendum - how childish you sound. Remind me how many MPs were elected in 2017 to deliver the result of that referendum
Uh oh, Johnson going against the will of the people!! I expect the “democracy” fans in this thread will be calling for his head!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?