People also seem to ignore that some countries outside of the EU benefited in all those same ways to a greater or lesser extent so that really isn't a valid argument. Some individual trades have been somewhat sacrificed...with a somewhat callous approach for those in them.The terms changed were agreed by our elected government, that’s democracy. We always had the veto option which our democratically elected government didn’t use. That’s democracy. A lot happened in those forty years including living standards rising, expendable income rising etc. Things improved immeasurably in the U.K. as EU members. People seem to ignore that.
But what? We ARE exploring effective, mutually beneficial ways of trading with the EU already - that forms part of the exiting agreement doesn't it?
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
A good chunk of the problems on the Spanish South coast are caused by Algerians or Moroccans too. Same In the Canary Islands.
What has that got to do with the EU?
Ah...back over that old ground. Messages/lies from both camps might well have confused the issues for some. Thought we had all agreed that
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
I thought you were getting a German one anyway ?!Actually no. Several have said that I don’t have the “arrogance”. Funny that. Pretending that we are getting our sovereignty back and that we are a proud nation because we have blue passports is smug arrogance and I definitely don’t belong to that club.
The nation has decided that the pre-conditions (many of which were not apparent when originally voted to join) attached to being a part of the single trade market you describe - isn't worth it.We’re exploring trade with the EU except the possibility of joining or remaining the trading bloc known as the single market. The government has been clear on that. So we won’t explore a trading bloc on our doorstep who also happens to be one of our biggest trading partners but we’ll explore joining one on the opposite side of the world who we don’t even do the same trade with as we do with one member of the trading bloc on our doorstep. Where’s the sense in that. If we explore the possibility of membership of the single market and it proves to be more beneficial to the country to be in than out shouldn’t we be in? Or is it out means out at any cost so don’t explore every opportunity?
We might, as a nation, end up worse off (your preferred vision I am thinking) or better off. We have to wait & see.
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
I thought you were getting a German one anyway ?!
Nothing stupid or snide...& you confirmed it was spot on too! I suppose the word 'chosen' could be substituted for 'preferred' - as for the rest of the sentiment in the main I agree - but longer term I tend to believe(/hope) we have sufficient talent in this country to turn it around & we will in fact be at least as well off overall.why make a stupid snide comment like that?
I'm convinced we'll be worse off, I don't want that outcome and hope I'm wrong. I don't think anyone on here who thinks the leave vote was wrong wants to see us slip into recession but their interpretation of the evidence is that we will struggle post Brexit.
If Tony wanted that outcome I don't think he'd be arguing so passionately for a reversal of the referendum outcome. Something I disagree with him on.
Nothing stupid or snide...& you confirmed it was spot on too! I suppose the word 'chosen' could be substituted for 'preferred' - as for the rest of the sentiment in the main I agree - but longer term I tend to believe(/hope) we have sufficient talent in this country to turn it around & we will in fact be at least as well off overall.
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
Nothing stupid or snide...& you confirmed it was spot on too! I suppose the word 'chosen' could be substituted for 'preferred' - as for the rest of the sentiment in the main I agree - but longer term I tend to believe(/hope) we have sufficient talent in this country to turn it around & we will in fact be at least as well off overall.
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
The nation has decided that the pre-conditions (many of which were not apparent when originally voted to join) attached to being a part of the single trade market you describe - isn't worth it.
So we are exploring new ways to work with it & beyond it...all seems simple to me. We might, as a nation, end up worse off (your preferred vision I am thinking) or better off. We have to wait & see.
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
why make a stupid snide comment like that?
I'm convinced we'll be worse off, I don't want that outcome and hope I'm wrong. I don't think anyone on here who thinks the leave vote was wrong wants to see us slip into recession but their interpretation of the evidence is that we will struggle post Brexit.
If Tony wanted that outcome I don't think he'd be arguing so passionately for a reversal of the referendum outcome. Something I disagree with him on.
By 'it' I meant the doom & gloom perceived by you & your sympathisers. Nothing moreTurn the country round? We were doing well GDP wise and economically before Brexit. The problem was not the economy, but the disparity between those doing well and those just about managing. Will that change in a right wing Brexit Britain?
I've confirmed nothing. Being convinced isn't the same as wanting you're own predicted outcome.
I'm convinced we'll lose to Stoke tomorrow but sincerely hope I'm wrong.
I'm sure you're right, longer term we'll turn it round, but sufficiently to have made it all worth it?
Well my comment was pretty stupid in your view...your response to it is pretty stupid in mine because I think you've missed something in its sentimentMy preferred vision? It’s what I anticipate, it’s not preferred. Pretty stupid thing to say.
By 'it' I meant the doom & gloom perceived by you & your sympathisers. Nothing more
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
Amazingly, I find myself agreeing with some of those quotes.
Well if he's confident leave would win he's right, it would indeed kill off all debate about whether to join or re-join, whatever happens once / if we leave.Wonder what his motivation is?
NHS winter crisis: A&E patient wait joint-worst on record
What this country really needs is to keep taking another 250,000 people every year for the foreseeable future, because things are going just dandy for the present inhabitants !
I'd say I look forward to seeing how we do without the (monetary and staffing) contributions immigrants make to the state but... I'm really not.defund.
make it fail.
privatise.
Oldest trick in the capitalist/neo liberal book.
Well if he's confident leave would win he's right, it would indeed kill off all debate about whether to join or re-join, whatever happens once / if we leave.
Without a second, he's also right that there'll always be a call to stay in / rejoin, especially if the economy goes badly once leaving.
It's the same as calling a snap election to solidify your power base, not without risk... but the rewards make it worthwhile chancing.
I'd say I look forward to seeing how we do without the (monetary and staffing) contributions immigrants make to the state but... I'm really not.
Nigel Farage must read this thread.
I have a feeling that his desire for a second referendum is just to massage his own ego.
I suspect Ferage is trying to pull a fast one here. We don’t need another leave or remain in the EU referendum. We’ve done that, we voted leave and I accept that.
What we need is a soft or hard brexit referendum. In other words something like Norway’s arrangement that Ferage once loved and Boris was selling pretty much during the leave campaign or the out means out brexit that leave seems to have morphed into which the government was never given a mandate for.
I accept the result of the referendum. I just don’t accept that the government was ever given a mandate for what terms that would be on. If we’re having a second referendum that’s what it should be on, the terms and Ferage knows this but as he’s changed his mind on loving what Norway has he has to revert back to an in out referendum on the premise that it means hard brexit. It’s a con. Don’t be fooled by it.
Amazingly, I find myself agreeing with some of those quotes.
Yes. He is right. People like me will not stop moaning and saying that Brexit is a con with what we now know...KNOW? YOUR PREDICTION OF THE FUTURE IS NOT FACT UNTIL IT HAS HAPPENED. Hard, soft, a few years of slowing growth or maybe many years etc..
Bring it on and get a clear majority one way or the other based on at least some experience THE ONLY EXPERIENCE WE HAVE SO FAR IS KNEE-JERK REACTIONS BASED UPON UNCERTAINTY...NOTHING WORSE THAN WE HAVE SEEN IN THE PAST WHILST FIRMLY IN THE EU SO FAR...of Brexit.
Ask the EU to debate the reasons for Brexit and offer solutions...I THINK WE HAVE TRIED THAT - IT HAS BEEN FALLING UPIN DEAF EARS...to any problems they see as being as being fixable to improve the EU. Offer remain and reform. Or not.
Farage is scum and is claiming that a huge majority would back Brexit, so there is no risk to leavers that the decision will be reversed and a huge victory would show the „iron will“ of the British people. It would enhance out negotiating position. If he is wrong, and we vote for remain after all, then the problem is also solved...IT WOULDN'T BE SOLVED - HE WOULD SIMPLY HAVE HIS PLATFORM BACK & ALL THE ATTENTION HE CLEARLY CRAVES... We save money and regain business confidence and the government can concentrate on the problems of the day e.g. the NHS.
We cannot lose...YOU ALREADY DID!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?