They do look far and away the best, properly unstoppable.
Who's everyones picks for KC LA?
be honest do you watch nfl or just check the results every so often?You relished a 3 point home win against CJ Beathard and the 1-5 49ers? That will live long in memory will it? Wow, how the mighty have fallen
The rules are the same for everyone? The same rules which have protected AR and given GB and lots of other teams 15 yards on many occasions this season.
Yeah, definitely.Skins fans, Kap?
I see that completely differently, Kupp will obviously be a big loss but I think McVey is one of the best offensive HC in the league, in fact I'd go as far as saying I'm still not sold on Goff, just think his coach knows how to use him. The defence there is a beast with a Coordinator that has a ring.Rams do few things in offense but do them extremely well.
Rams been doing just enough to win games. Have they got the scope to kick on? For all the big names on defence haven't actually been defending that well.
Kupp potentially a big loss.
Give Rams home field advantage by less than 7 pts. But not surprised either if Chiefs go in with improving defence and post some big points.
I watched your game vs Seattle where you went Punt, Punt, Punt, FG, Punt in the second half after leading 21-17 in the first half.be honest do you watch nfl or just check the results every so often?
beat bears when AR came back from leaving the game and overturned a first half deficit
beat 49ers with a great drive in final seconds when game looked gone
these are games fans remember fondly
I'd give him a go if it wasn't for all the baggage, not sure this is the right time for the organization to bring in such a divisive QB. Something of a disconnect between the fans and the team currently with Norman's recent comments, stadium only 3/4s full.Skins fans, Kap?
2 Rodgers fumbles, both in his own half, and drives forever breaking down if I remember correctly? But yea, lets blame someone else. Rodgers cost you 10 points and Crosby cost you 9 in the first half, but yea, lets use Crosby as a scape goat.more trolling. Mason crosby missed 4 or 5 FG attempts vs detroit. But lets blame AR lmao. you ar enot even being serious.
this is nearly as bad as that time you you said packers were shit and kept pedicting them to lose next game then they made it to final 4 lmao
butthurt because your redskins wont make playoffs...........again. a successfull season for you is hoping GB dont make playoffs for first time in close to a decade haha
You don't think Kap comes with baggage?baggage lol. a racist to boot
I'm not sure we'll ever see him on an NFL field again. It would take a very brave owner to bring him in, they all seem to be falling in line and keeping him out of the spotlight. Everything that surrounded his movement hurt the NFL and the most important thing for the owners is to protect the brand.I don't think we'll see Kap in the league until the end of the lawsuit but I think he'd be a great pickup for someone. Would probably take the minimum QB contract and would have a massive point to prove.
Yeah, but he's good at taking the knee.I'm not sure we'll ever see him on an NFL field again. It would take a very brave owner to bring him in, they all seem to be falling in line and keeping him out of the spotlight. Everything that surrounded his movement hurt the NFL and the most important thing for the owners is to protect the brand.
Inactivity a real issue aswell now, he hasn't thrown a ball since 2016 and was 3-16 on his last 19 starts.
Only to a racist piece of shit. So NFL owners sure, but fans saying no...wow disgustingYou don't think Kap comes with baggage?
Trolling of the highest order.Only to a racist piece of shit. So NFL owners sure, but fans saying no...wow disgusting
go back to making up lies about AR. guy could throw a touch down and you would point out one 2nd and 7 failed earlier in drive ahahah
naive fan aint you? new to the sport? you strike me as more of a madden gamer
You are gold.Only to a racist piece of shit. So NFL owners sure, but fans saying no...wow disgusting
go back to making up lies about AR. guy could throw a touch down and you would point out one 2nd and 7 failed earlier in drive ahahah
naive fan aint you? new to the sport? you strike me as more of a madden gamer
Not sold on Rams defence as a complete unit. Give up a lot of yds particularly to the run and there are gaps in the secondary . Obviously with Donald have some highlight reel plays but overall are there to be scored on.I see that completely differently, Kupp will obviously be a big loss but I think McVey is one of the best offensive HC in the league, in fact I'd go as far as saying I'm still not sold on Goff, just think his coach knows how to use him. The defence there is a beast with a Coordinator that has a ring.
Rams for me, although I wouldn't be surprised of KC win.
Not usually, no.there can only be one superbowl winner
find that american football fans tend to think everyone else must be shit
so if you are 14-2 but lose in wildcard or conference finals for e,g then you must have had a easy schedule and never played anyone decent etc
lots of good teams, not winning superbowl doesnt mean that you were not good enough to win it if you know what i mean
Need to create a good pocket for Bradford as needs a bit of time to get rid of the ball but was very good for us.I see Riggo's Rag, which I read regularly, has listed 5 potential QB's for Washington.
1. Kaepernick - Already dismissed though by Washington themselves
2. Josh Johnson - Yeah, who? Apparently been on the books of 11 different teams over the years.
3. T J Yates - Ex Houston
4. Mark Sanchez
5. Sam Bradford
Out of those 4 (discounting Kap), Bradford all day long for me.
Basically, because all the rest are very, very poor.
Is there? Even though he is released?Need to create a good pocket for Bradford as needs a bit of time to get rid of the ball but was very good for us.
But isn't the issue with Bradford that there is a hefty 2nd year left on his deal 20m+ if he is picked up during the season.
I see Riggo's Rag, which I read regularly, has listed 5 potential QB's for Washington.
1. Kaepernick - Already dismissed though by Washington themselves
2. Josh Johnson - Yeah, who? Apparently been on the books of 11 different teams over the years.
3. T J Yates - Ex Houston
4. Mark Sanchez
5. Sam Bradford
Out of those 4 (discounting Kap), Bradford all day long for me.
Basically, because all the rest are very, very poor.
He's 32 though, so never made a breakthrough in all those years.I think were going to roll with Colt and just looking to pick up a FA back up? In which case I can understand the Sanchez move, been a back up at other teams since leaving the Jets so will have experience of coming in cold, picking up the play book etc. I think if the decision is to go with Colt then that has to be 100%, would worry with Bradford that a bad half from Colt and everyone will start talking about Bradford.
I think all in on Colt and make it known that Sanchez is purely a backup. Lets not forget that Cousins was a back up for many years before becoming the highest paid QB, Colt deserves a chance, who knows he may just surprise us as Cousins did. McCoy was actually drafted higher than Cousins.
my bad. He's cleared waivers so is available at a reduced rate but would still be a huge risk with his injury situation.Is there? Even though he is released?
Not sure how it works to be honest, but thought it would be like over here and football and once you were released you were a free agent, no strings attached.
Take it it's not the same in the NFL then?
Yeah, know he's had I injuries and he's not the quickest these days either, but he's better than the rest on that list.my bad. He's cleared waivers so is available at a reduced rate but would still be a huge risk with his injury situation.
Yeah, know he's had I injuries and he's not the quickest these days either, but he's better than the rest on that list.
McCoy may now well be the first choice, but if something happens to him you've got to have adequate cover.
Last time I saw Sanchez play he was throwing interceptions all over the shop.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?