fernandopartridge
Well-Known Member
When a steak bake is piping hot and it burns a big blister in the top of your mouth.
and once you've had a bit you have to keep eating it otherwise the filling starts to fall out
When a steak bake is piping hot and it burns a big blister in the top of your mouth.
Seriously hot if it melts the fillings in your teeth!and once you've had a bit you have to keep eating it otherwise the filling starts to fall out
When a steak bake is piping hot and it burns a big blister in the top of your mouth.
Related to that, the noise people make when they eat something too hot. Worst misophonia trigger of them all
I saw you can get earplugs that apparently helps now. Filters those noises out.
100k a year now?That’s pretty much it, although I have doubled my salary in 5 years
100k a year now?
So what was your wage that got doubled?I don’t think even my Head gets that
So what was your wage that got doubled?![]()
Probably initial starting salary that was shit to begin with.So what was your wage that got doubled?![]()
Congratulations£22k up to £44k
Congratulations
So are you ready to go on strike for a living wage?
Congratulations
So are you ready to go on strike for a living wage?
I fully agree with you....then you admit your payrise was 100% over 5 years in the years of low inflation and you want us to back you up for a lot more when the man on the street gets much less. You knew what you would earn but a 100% raise was simply not enough after taking the position.We’re striking so education can get the proper funding it deserves. I for one think children deserve better than to be taught in classes of 35 in rooms built for 30. Do you?
I agree. But what would they be happy with after a 100% payrise after just 5 years.Let's be honest, teachers, people that work in healthcare, the emergency services etc - they don't get paid enough. They're core elements that keep a country ticking. It's a wider problem.
According to figures today salaries are increasing at 7.7%I fully agree with you....then you admit your payrise was 100% over 5 years in the years of low inflation and you want us to back you up for a lot more when the man on the street gets much less. You knew what you would earn but a 100% raise was simply not enough after taking the position.
So please tell me why 100% payrise wasn't good enough in 5 years of low inflation years and what do you think would be acceptable now.
I fully agree with you....then you admit your payrise was 100% over 5 years in the years of low inflation and you want us to back you up for a lot more when the man on the street gets much less. You knew what you would earn but a 100% raise was simply not enough after taking the position.
So please tell me why 100% payrise wasn't good enough in 5 years of low inflation years and what do you think would be acceptable now.
It’s not a pay rise is it though really? Merely a recognition of experience and then additional responsibility that he has to work for.I agree. But what would they be happy with after a 100% payrise after just 5 years.
100% over 5 years is how much?According to figures today salaries are increasing at 7.7%
So a 100% payrise over 5 years isn't good enough as over the last 10 years of low inflation it is 20% a year but still below below the last 13 years?I got a 100% rise after having been promoted quickly and taken on additional responsibilities. The profession as a whole has seen a real terms pay drop in the region of 20% since 2010.
As it is I am still actively trying to leave because the conditions even with the money aren’t worth it. Wife in a similar position.
Is it really though?It’s not a pay rise is it though really? Merely a recognition of experience and then additional responsibility that he has to work for.
Current UPS3 is £43K and would take a new teacher a minimum of 11 years to reach it assuming no additional TLR responsibility.
Is it really though?
You take on a job. You know the payrate. Yet even though you get a payrise of 100% after just 5 years it just isn't good enough.
Yes the pay rate should be more. But I'm sorry as a 100% payrise in just 5 years isn't good enough for some. How about having
a massive tax increase for those of us that hardly get a pay Increase so those who got 100% in the last 5 years of low inflation and we need to come out in sympathy with them.
Brighton earned promotions and the pay that came with it.How about having
a massive tax increase for those of us that hardly get a pay Increase
It's not about other people's salary though, it's about whether the pay rises (and his pay rises would be because of incremental progression in post and / or promotion rather than a fair pay deal) are fair and inline with what should be offered.I fully agree with you....then you admit your payrise was 100% over 5 years in the years of low inflation and you want us to back you up for a lot more when the man on the street gets much less. You knew what you would earn but a 100% raise was simply not enough after taking the position.
So please tell me why 100% payrise wasn't good enough in 5 years of low inflation years and what do you think would be acceptable now.
/googles before agreeing!Sorry mate, but it looks like you are exercising some crab bucket syndrome here.
I retire in exactly 4 weeks. That will stop meBrighton earned promotions and the pay that came with it.
What's stopping you doing the same?
I retire in exactly 4 weeks. That will stop me![]()
And as I have always said everyone should do what is best for them. But 100% payrise after just 5 years in times of low inflation and complaining that the payrise wasn't enough is a bit too much.It's not about other people's salary though, it's about whether the pay rises (and his pay rises would be because of incremental progression in post and / or promotion rather than a fair pay deal) are fair and inline with what should be offered.
The payrise can not be enough. It isn't a pay rise he's had, more a rise in pay.But 100% payrise after just 5 years in times of low inflation and complaining that the payrise wasn't enough is a bit too much.
I'm chilled. Just had enough of those who are not happy with a 100% raise in 5 years but say they are not paid enough and don't care where all this money is coming from.Then poor yourself a glass and chill the fuck out![]()
A pay rise is a rise in pay. But on here the truth is not the truthThe payrise can not be enough. It isn't a pay rise he's had, more a rise in pay.
And he's not striking just for him, is he?
I'm chilled. Just had enough of those who are not happy with a 100% raise in 5 years but say they are not paid enough and don't care where all this money is coming from.
You accept a job. Then moan like fuck your wages have only gone up by 100% in 5 years.
How much has yours gone up in the last 5 years?
A lot of them just call themselves SEO Content Creators now and just pinch other people’s content and then come higher because they’re writing for a tabloid.Again though, there's a difference between Journalism and Content Creation surely?
Is it really though?
You take on a job. You know the payrate. Yet even though you get a payrise of 100% after just 5 years it just isn't good enough.
Yes the pay rate should be more. But I'm sorry as a 100% payrise in just 5 years isn't good enough for some. How about having
a massive tax increase for those of us that hardly get a pay Increase so those who got 100% in the last 5 years of low inflation and we need to come out in sympathy with them.