He's done a fucking phenomenal job at coventry , not semi decent
He has done a phenomenal job at Coventry - most of it with Viveash
Currently it isn’t even semi decent.
We were saying it was because of fatigue due to the cup run. No matter how brilliant a manager or coach, you are going to struggle with exhausted players - and I would imagine the manner of the Wembley defeat had some mental repercussions.There is no such excuse now.This time last year, with Viveash in situ, we were in a very similar boat.
Let's give him time.
He's talking about the start of the season.We were saying it was because of fatigue due to the cup run. No matter how brilliant a manager or coach, you are going to struggle with exhausted players - and I would imagine the manner of the Wembley defeat had some mental repercussions.There is no such excuse now.
We were saying it was because of fatigue due to the cup run. No matter how brilliant a manager or coach, you are going to struggle with exhausted players - and I would imagine the manner of the Wembley defeat had some mental repercussions.There is no such excuse now.
Sorry, misread. Last season was all about gelling wasn’t it. Pretty much the same argument though.He's talking about the start of the season.
Apologies, misread. Last season was all about gelling wasn’t it. Pretty much the same argument though.I was on about the start of last season
No, this was from someone inside the club.That’s probably based on the rumour posted on here.
This time last year was before cup runWe were saying it was because of fatigue due to the cup run. No matter how brilliant a manager or coach, you are going to struggle with exhausted players - and I would imagine the manner of the Wembley defeat had some mental repercussions.There is no such excuse now.
Was gross misconduct or was to do with his Mrs?From what I've heard it was
I have already apologised for misreading the post. This time last year it was all the new players needed to gel.This time last year was before cup run
Doesn't matter who is in charge , clubs have bad patches so we can't just sack every manager that doesI have already apologised for misreading the post. This time last year it was all the new players needed to gel.
Being loyal to the old school really I'd say, maybe that's the reason for jettisoning Lawrence Vivash, where's saddle here has he lost his internet connection?Sorry, misread. Last season was all about gelling wasn’t it. Pretty much the same argument though.
From what I've heard it was
A promotion, better pay and potentially being closer to home, correct? If so, was there anything the club could have done to keep him?Except your conviently forgetting that Lawrence had gone for want of a better contract,and you have to a lead in to these appointments, they don't just happen do they?
If you say so, then pay the compo and bring an end to this rediculous dance!A promotion, better pay and potentially being closer to home, correct? If so, was there anything the club could have done to keep him?
Managers and coaches are like players, there’s plenty of talent out there so there’s no point in fixating on old personnel.
Think it’s connected to a joke about Tynan ‘No’ ScopeDidn’t Adi say in a interview early in the year that he had found love and was in a relationship with someone who worked at the club ? Thought that was a bit of an odd disclosure and did wonder if that had something to do with his leaving somehow.
Gossipy I know…
I just think we need to give these things a bit more time. Robins seems to have picked this coaching unit and he will find a way to make this work.If you say so, then pay the compo and bring an end to this rediculous dance!
This to be honest concerns me the most. Last two years 100% understood the slow start, first year we lost our pitch due the pests and as such struggled to get match fitnessThis time last year was before cup run
I was told it was Adi's response to being introduced to the new Performance Director - "no-one is going to tell me what to do".
Bye Adi.
Don’t think it is purely on the solicitor statement from Adi. If it was a disagreement don’t think solicitors would be involved.If that’s true that’s fucking shocking. Only one person in that exchange has the right to throw their weight around.
Don’t think it is purely on the solicitor statement from Adi. If it was a disagreement don’t think solicitors would be involved.
What’s the obsession with writing fan fiction about this woman?Unfair dismissal? Sacked for saying something to/about her that’s lead to disciplinary action? He’s been there long enough for all the workers rights to apply and if he’s taking us to court rather than us taking him to court…
What’s the obsession with writing fan fiction about this woman?
As far as I’m aware almost no one on here has any insight into her role and how much she has been involved in decisions taken this season.
Unfair dismissal? Sacked for saying something to/about her that’s lead to disciplinary action? He’s been there long enough for all the workers rights to apply and if he’s taking us to court rather than us taking him to court…
Think this has only got worse without the club or Adi or really anything coming out by anyone in regards to Adi.We’re literally discussing a claim that this has come from within the club and whether it fits with what’s known already.
Throwing my own conspiracy in, but bear with. Given that we don't have an assistant manager, I don't think it is beyond possibility that dismissal was shaped towards the role being 'dissolved'.
its honestly fucking wild - there's something that people just really can't handle about itWhat’s the obsession with writing fan fiction about this woman?
Being loyal to the old school really I'd say, maybe that's the reason for jettisoning Lawrence Vivash, where's saddle here has he lost his internet connection?
Ive refrained from this conversation as il just get the usual shite about 'an agenda'
Throwing my own conspiracy in, but bear with. Given that we don't have an assistant manager, I don't think it is beyond possibility that dismissal was shaped towards the role being 'dissolved'. It's a pretty interesting loop hole that I think Grendel mentioned previously, but I have seen it being used in an old job where one of the manager's had got lazy and wasn't performing.
They knew it was a really difficult task to get rid of her, as the team were doing well (regardless of her lack of stewardship). She had been there ten years and actually built the team up herself originally. In the end they said they were going to just operate the department with team leaders, and her 'manager role' was no longer needed. They paid her off for 11months salary, which was more than enough to stop her trying to fight it.
If it was gross misconduct, surely it would just be that? There doesn't even seem to be a case of 'suspended under investigation' and the lack of assistant manager is a pretty big thing. It isn't impossible that Viveash has done something shocking, but with some of the rumours around coaching style, and dissent towards new staff, it wouldn't completely surprise me if they have just used this loop hole to get rid of him for being unagreeable or a bit tough on players. @Saddlebrains - apologies if it wasn't you, but wasn't there something about Sheaf saying 'it's him or me'?
As Viveash in the public eye, reputation counts for a lot. Hence the solicitor involvement and lack of real word from the club.
Fuck it, spill the beans, might stop the endless bickering.
Wasn't me mate. Sheaf is a consummate pro
From What I understand
-Robins and Adi didn't get on away from football. Mental really as on the field they were an unreal team
- Robins OK'd Adis exit to an extent. Basically understood Adi had to go, and said 'il stay' but was under the impression he would have an assistant same as before
- It's true the players, mainly last seasons influxes didn't agree with Adis 'old skool'methods. Some felt the training was quite basic, while being hard physically. Adi is a coach that can get average players (for the championship) to play a level above themselves. Think your Hyams, Fadz's, Kellys. Hes not very good at getting players with a higher ceiling, to said ceiling
- It's true he had a few run ins with players, as again they didn't appreciate his 'old skool' methods of telling them about themselves
- The 'restructure' was planned to an extent, upon Doug making clear how the off field revamp was gonna work,it was done quicker as Adi took it upon himself to make his feelings known about the way things were being done at the club as he knew due to the new players views on him that he could be on his way out
Now lastly, the actual 'incident' was apparently Adi telling Doug exactly what he thought of him, his ego, his off field ideas, his interfering with team matters and how it goes against the close knit set up that Robins and he had developed and brought so much success to us with.
People don't cross Doug like that and survive, as I mentioned previously with the O'Hare contract situation (Doug got wind Callum went mental for being hooked at Albion, removed the contract offer off the back of it basically saying I'm in charge you little shit get fucked)
I'm sure this is down to my 'agenda' though.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?