We look poor (8 Viewers)

[Nick]

I think many on here are fucking stupid yes

It's probably why you have the same 4 or 5 trying to give you a reacharound because you say "ahahaha you mentioned Robins" after you have been trying for hours to calculate how you can make out he was the messiah and we were playing like prime Brazil before he went.

It's the same handful of people and ROS trying to get some mates, every time.

 

---

[Nick]

Lampard will take us down.

I'll have £100 on it? Mine can go to Samaritans, where do you want yours if you win?

Another poster who is fucking desperate since robins went (even though he wanted it) .

Going on about people looking silly, calls for robins to go and then spends weeks crying about it.

 

[Ccfcisparks]

I said at the time he went.

I can understand why Robins went, and I would have got rid of him too if there was an obvious replacement.

the problem is none of the alternatives seemed a good fit.

Lampard has shown glimpses of what we could do, such as the 4-0 at Plymouth, but there have been some disastrous results such as the Portsmouth game and Cardiff

 

[Evo1883]

How do you discuss something with somebody who just wants to make out losing a game under robins is better than drawing a game under lampard because they suddenly want to start wanking over XG if it can help them try and justify it?

Since Wednesday the only times I've mentioned robins are to tell you that you've mentioned robins .

You won't let people discuss the team and how it's doing ? Or not doing

 

[Evo1883]

It's probably why you have the same 4 or 5 trying to give you a reacharound because you say "ahahaha you mentioned Robins" after you have been trying for hours to calculate how you can make out he was the messiah and we were playing like prime Brazil before he went.

It's the same handful of people and ROS trying to get some mates, every time.

Nick , il take these reacharounds as it means I don't have to give myself 1 like you have to

 

[shmmeee]

I'll have £100 on it?

Another poster who is fucking desperate since robins went (even though he wanted it) .

The only one who is desperate is you. Desperately running round attacking anyone who isn’t happy with this absolute garbage and bringing Robins up every five second while claiming others are obsessed.

We’re shit and I’m allowed to say it. Ban me if I’m not.

 

[Nick]

Since Wednesday the only times I've mentioned robins are to tell you that you've mentioned robins .

You won't let people discuss the team and how it's doing ? Or not doing

No, what you do is highly insinuate things and make it pretty obvious and think you're clever because you didn't type his name even though anybody with eyes can see what you're getting at.

 

[shmmeee]

So fucking tedious when Nick goes into owner defence mode.

 

[pusbccfc]

I'll have £100 on it? Mine can go to Samaritans, where do you want yours if you win?

Another poster who is fucking desperate since robins went (even though he wanted it) .

Going on about people looking silly, calls for robins to go and then spends weeks crying about it.

There's plenty on here who would happily contribute to this.

 

[Nick]

The only one who is desperate is you. Desperately running round attacking anyone who isn’t happy with this absolute garbage and bringing Robins up every five second while claiming others are obsessed.

We’re shit and I’m allowed to say it. Ban me if I’m not.

Loads of people have said we are shit, I have said we are shit. Have you noticed how I only call out particular posts and why?

Why are you going on about banning for saying we are shit? Trying to be a martyr or something.

Do you want the bet about relegation or not?

 

[Evo1883]

No, what you do is highly insinuate things and make it pretty obvious and think you're clever because you didn't type his name even though anybody with eyes can see what you're getting at.

I'm talking about the team and how I feel it's doing .

If you think that I love Robins and can't get over it then think that , I don't give a fuck mate .

You don't need to reply to me ?

 

[Nick]

So fucking tedious when Nick goes into owner defence mode.

Who is defending an owner? I have been calling things out since he took over. People were getting excited over singing his cringeworthy song or him being in a video in his pants.

It's the standard go to because I point out that you were going on about Robins going and then act like a 12 year old girl when it happens.

Why make things up?

 

[Nick]

I'm talking about the team and how I feel it's doing .

If you think that I love Robins and can't get over it then think that , I don't give a fuck mate .

You don't need to reply to me ?

No, what you do is have to compare everything to when the last manager was here.

"Yeah but we lost 3-0 under Robins but we were still better and it was better than when we lost 2-1 in the last couple of minutes".

If you don't like being replied to you're probably better off making a private DM chat with the handful of people who are still mourning with you.

 

[Evo1883]

No, what you do is have to compare everything to when the last manager was here.

"Yeah but we lost 3-0 under Robins but we were still better and it was better than when we lost 2-1 in the last couple of minutes".

If you don't like being replied to you're probably better off making a private DM chat with the handful of people who are still mourning with you.

If you don't like people talking about the last manager then why do you run a forum ya mong

 

[SBT]

No, what you do is highly insinuate things and make it pretty obvious and think you're clever because you didn't type his name even though anybody with eyes can see what you're getting at.

Really?
Outlandish thing to claim…
Be realistic:
If people wanted to talk about our old manager,
No way they would do it in code
Surely?

 

[Nick]

If you don't like people talking about the last manager then why do you run a forum ya mong

Where have I said I don't like it or would ban anybody for it? You're the one saying "don't reply to me" "don't talk to me".

 

[shmmeee]

Loads of people have said we are shit, I have said we are shit. Have you noticed how I only call out particular posts and why?

Why are you going on about banning for saying we are shit? Trying to be a martyr or something.

Do you want the bet about relegation or not?

No I don’t and I don’t think the admin of a forum with several admitted gambling addicts on it should be running around insisting everyone gambles with him either.

We may scrape staying up. I’d back us to be in a relegation battle and the same next season because Lampard has shown zero competency or sign of it so far. The only people who think he has are those desperate to prove some point about Robins.

Fuck Robins. He’s the Stoke manager. I’m a Coventry fan and Frank Lampard has been garbage from day one and I don’t understand why I’m not allowed to say that. If it was Lati or Dasilva you wouldn’t have an issue.

 

[Evo1883]

Really?
Outlandish thing to claim…
Be realistic:
If people wanted to talk about our old manager,
No way they would do it in code
Surely?

I have no issues discussing robins .. at all

 

[Nick]

Really?
Outlandish thing to claim…
Be realistic:
If people wanted to talk about our old manager,
No way they would do it in code
Surely?

It's not even coded; it's blatantly obvious, really.

Hence it's not anybody who is saying "we are shit". It's people looking for stats to try and skew to them justify losing 3-0 a few years ago as better under a different manager or others who actually wanted robins sacked saying we had no chances against Millwall.

 

[Evo1883]

Where have I said I don't like it or would ban anybody for it? You're the one saying "don't reply to me" "don't talk to me".

You keep hijacking every thread where people talk about form and how we are doing ?

Or am I missing something

 

[Nick]

No I don’t and I don’t think the admin of a forum with several admitted gambling addicts on it should be running around insisting everyone gambles with him either.

Give it a rest you soft c**t.

You said it, do you want to back it up?

I'm not asking for everybody to gamble with me or running around. Why make things up again?

 

[Evo1883]

It's not even coded; it's blatantly obvious, really.

Hence it's not anybody who is saying "we are shit". It's people looking for stats to try and skew to them justify losing 3-0 a few years ago as better under a different manager or others who actually wanted robins sacked saying we had no chances against Millwall.

Our worst performances this season have been under lampard , there .. didn't mention * once mate or Norwich 3 years ago

 

[SBT]

It's not even coded; it's blatantly obvious, really.

Maybe it is
Alternatively, you’re just seeing his name everywhere
Really difficult to
Know

 

[Nick]

You keep hijacking every thread where people talk about form and how we are doing ?

Or am I missing something

Yeah you are. I'm clearly not doing it when people just say "we are shit" am I? It's when it's "we are shit because this time a year ago we would have won 19-0" type nonsense.

 

[shmmeee]

Give it a rest you soft c**t.

You said it, do you want to back it up?

I'm not asking for everybody to gamble with me or running around. Why make things up again?

You and Grendel have a culture of if someone says something you disagree with demanding they make a large bet or they should be ridiculed. I’ll be honest I think considering the makeup of the forum it’s a shitty thing to do.

Internet points are enough mate.

 

[Evo1883]

Yeah you are. I'm clearly not doing it when people just say "we are shit" am I? It's when it's "we are shit because this time a year ago we would have won 19-0" type nonsense.

So you are deciding you know what I think which you don't and hijack all the threads I'm involved in instead ?

 

[shmmeee]

Yeah you are. I'm clearly not doing it when people just say "we are shit" am I? It's when it's "we are shit because this time a year ago we would have won 19-0" type nonsense.

Those aren’t the posts you are replying to.

 

[Earlsdon-Loyal-Blue]

If Doug is so desperate for promotion, he'll want improvements by March. Not saying he'll be sacked but he'll be asking questions by then.

I didn’t want Robins to go, he has far more promotions on his CV than anyone touted for the job. I wouldn’t have touched Lampard with a shitty stick but dickhead Doug did just that because it’s a Tory appointing another Tory and he wanted a name.

Michael Schumacher would have been far better and has 1 promotion more than Lampard’s 0.

 

[Nick]

You and Grendel have a culture of if someone says something you disagree with demanding they make a large bet or they should be ridiculed. I’ll be honest I think considering the makeup of the forum it’s a shitty thing to do.

Internet points are enough mate.

No, you made a statement so I said let's have a charity bet.

You clearly said it for internet points, that's the ironic thing. Now you go on about being banned and acting like a victim and how it's shitty. then it's "owner defence mode" Have a word with yourself.

 

[Nick]

Those aren’t the posts you are replying to.

Go through the match thread and look at how many people said we were shit (me included). Have a look at the ones I call out about that shite.

 

[Grendel]

Maybe it is
Alternatively, you’re just seeing his name everywhere
Really difficult to
Know

Well I fail to see why we’d want to know how many shots we had against Norwich last season unless it’s a managerial reference

 

[Evo1883]

Well I fail to see why we’d want to know how many shots we had against Norwich last season unless it’s a managerial reference

The season before we went to Norwich and had one of our worst performances of the season and lost 3-0

Statistically / visually we were far worse yesterday and only lost 2-1

What's the struggle ?

We were fucking diabolical second half yesterday, DIABOLOCAL

 

[Grendel]

The season before we went to Norwich and had one of our worst performances of the season and lost 3-0

Statistically / visually we were far worse yesterday and only lost 2-1

What's the struggle

We weren’t far worse in reality as we nearly won

 

[Evo1883]

We weren’t far worse in reality as we nearly won

And that is why you cannot be talked to about performances and form .

 

[shmmeee]

No, you made a statement so I said let's have a charity bet.

You clearly said it for internet points, that's the ironic thing. Now you go on about being banned and acting like a victim and how it's shitty. then it's "owner defence mode" Have a word with yourself.

No you didn’t. You’ve gone back and edited it now which is an admission you shouldn’t have done it. And saying it’s a charity bet doesn’t change the fact it’s a bet.



It’s the internet. Grendel spreadsheet and internet points is all you need. On all seriousness mate I think you might have a gambling problem if “bet £100” is the first place you go in an argument.

You’ve done this for years. When you think the club needs defending you spend all day attacking anyone who says anything against your view. It’s tedious. It was tedious when it was Sisu and it’s tedious now. Just let people discuss on a forum.