I think many on here are fucking stupid yes
Lampard will take us down.
How do you discuss something with somebody who just wants to make out losing a game under robins is better than drawing a game under lampard because they suddenly want to start wanking over XG if it can help them try and justify it?
Nick , il take these reacharounds as it means I don't have to give myself 1 like you have toIt's probably why you have the same 4 or 5 trying to give you a reacharound because you say "ahahaha you mentioned Robins" after you have been trying for hours to calculate how you can make out he was the messiah and we were playing like prime Brazil before he went.
It's the same handful of people and ROS trying to get some mates, every time.
I'll have £100 on it?
Another poster who is fucking desperate since robins went (even though he wanted it) .
Since Wednesday the only times I've mentioned robins are to tell you that you've mentioned robins .
You won't let people discuss the team and how it's doing ? Or not doing
I'll have £100 on it? Mine can go to Samaritans, where do you want yours if you win?
Another poster who is fucking desperate since robins went (even though he wanted it) .
Going on about people looking silly, calls for robins to go and then spends weeks crying about it.
The only one who is desperate is you. Desperately running round attacking anyone who isn’t happy with this absolute garbage and bringing Robins up every five second while claiming others are obsessed.
We’re shit and I’m allowed to say it. Ban me if I’m not.
I'm talking about the team and how I feel it's doing .No, what you do is highly insinuate things and make it pretty obvious and think you're clever because you didn't type his name even though anybody with eyes can see what you're getting at.
So fucking tedious when Nick goes into owner defence mode.
I'm talking about the team and how I feel it's doing .
If you think that I love Robins and can't get over it then think that , I don't give a fuck mate .
You don't need to reply to me ?
No, what you do is have to compare everything to when the last manager was here.
"Yeah but we lost 3-0 under Robins but we were still better and it was better than when we lost 2-1 in the last couple of minutes".
If you don't like being replied to you're probably better off making a private DM chat with the handful of people who are still mourning with you.
Really?No, what you do is highly insinuate things and make it pretty obvious and think you're clever because you didn't type his name even though anybody with eyes can see what you're getting at.
If you don't like people talking about the last manager then why do you run a forum ya mong
Loads of people have said we are shit, I have said we are shit. Have you noticed how I only call out particular posts and why?
Why are you going on about banning for saying we are shit? Trying to be a martyr or something.
Do you want the bet about relegation or not?
Really?
Outlandish thing to claim…
Be realistic:
If people wanted to talk about our old manager,
No way they would do it in code
Surely?
Really?
Outlandish thing to claim…
Be realistic:
If people wanted to talk about our old manager,
No way they would do it in code
Surely?
Where have I said I don't like it or would ban anybody for it? You're the one saying "don't reply to me" "don't talk to me".
No I don’t and I don’t think the admin of a forum with several admitted gambling addicts on it should be running around insisting everyone gambles with him either.
It's not even coded; it's blatantly obvious, really.
Hence it's not anybody who is saying "we are shit". It's people looking for stats to try and skew to them justify losing 3-0 a few years ago as better under a different manager or others who actually wanted robins sacked saying we had no chances against Millwall.
Maybe it isIt's not even coded; it's blatantly obvious, really.
You keep hijacking every thread where people talk about form and how we are doing ?
Or am I missing something
Give it a rest you soft c**t.
You said it, do you want to back it up?
I'm not asking for everybody to gamble with me or running around. Why make things up again?
Yeah you are. I'm clearly not doing it when people just say "we are shit" am I? It's when it's "we are shit because this time a year ago we would have won 19-0" type nonsense.
Yeah you are. I'm clearly not doing it when people just say "we are shit" am I? It's when it's "we are shit because this time a year ago we would have won 19-0" type nonsense.
If Doug is so desperate for promotion, he'll want improvements by March. Not saying he'll be sacked but he'll be asking questions by then.
You and Grendel have a culture of if someone says something you disagree with demanding they make a large bet or they should be ridiculed. I’ll be honest I think considering the makeup of the forum it’s a shitty thing to do.
Internet points are enough mate.
Go through the match thread and look at how many people said we were shit (me included). Have a look at the ones I call out about that shite.Those aren’t the posts you are replying to.
Maybe it is
Alternatively, you’re just seeing his name everywhere
Really difficult to
Know
The season before we went to Norwich and had one of our worst performances of the season and lost 3-0Well I fail to see why we’d want to know how many shots we had against Norwich last season unless it’s a managerial reference
The season before we went to Norwich and had one of our worst performances of the season and lost 3-0
Statistically / visually we were far worse yesterday and only lost 2-1
What's the struggle
We weren’t far worse in reality as we nearly won
No, you made a statement so I said let's have a charity bet.
You clearly said it for internet points, that's the ironic thing. Now you go on about being banned and acting like a victim and how it's shitty. then it's "owner defence mode" Have a word with yourself.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?