The EU: In, out, shake it all about.... (36 Viewers)

As of right now, how are thinking of voting? In or out

  • Remain

    Votes: 23 37.1%
  • Leave

    Votes: 35 56.5%
  • Undecided

    Votes: 3 4.8%
  • Not registered or not intention to vote

    Votes: 1 1.6%

  • Total voters
    62
  • Poll closed .

martcov

Well-Known Member
I guess we could do it like voting in a GE in FPTP. Usually the party that gets 30% of the vote from 30% of the population gets to form a government. So lets get all the option down at once - second referendum, May's deal and no deal - and then whichever gets the most MP's voting for it, that's what we do.

As both are not popular with most voters, remain has to be on the table as an alternative.
 

djr8369

Well-Known Member
I'm not arguing that the Leave campaign was massively ambiguous and economical with the truth about what could and would be achievable. But it should've been set out as a clear two step process:
1. We leave the EU entirely and trade under WTO
2. After leaving we begin the process of negotiating new trade deals as a non-EU country.

That way at least this wrangling over pro and anti Brexit dividing the country for three years wouldn't have happened. We'd be out and that would be that.

Of all the people I know that voted leave there's no consensus between them of what they wanted. Some wanted to restrict freedom of movement (although ironically when pointed out this could make it their holidays abroad more awkward and expensive they weren't happy about it), others didn't because they work abroad. Some wanted no customs union, others did because it would affect their business. Some wanted to regain control of our laws despite not seeming to know exactly which ones they didn't want or which were EU driven and which weren't. I'm not sure most of the time.

That is why I favour a second referendum - purely to make the option completely and totally unambiguous.

The problem is in the time trading on WTO many business would go bust, relocate or at the very least completely restructure their supply chains. They then might need to do the same once a deal is reached. WTO just isn’t a practical option.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Vote of confidence. Lab Lib SNP plus some older remainer Tories against the rest of the Tories and DUP. Bye bye Tories. GE and/or PV. Parliament is at an impasse, put the cards on the table and let the people decide on the Brexit we now can see versus remain.

So let’s think this through (even though John McDonnell says that you are talking horseshit and this won’t happen)

Labour Party will not be able to call this motion until September

It’s not going to win it and any Tory Mp voting for it will be deselected and out of s Job - older ones? Peter bone, Bill Cash?

Even if it did then Corbyn will try to form a government and fail

Then a general election is scheduled

Oh we’ve already left
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Apart from him having being expelled from Labour.

So what - won’t stop him campaigning for his love of all things Brussels
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
It’s only the end if they go full tilt remain.

They say they will be supporting remain on the ballot and are pushing it to become official policy
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
As both are not popular with most voters, remain has to be on the table as an alternative.

I was going to put that in too, but the furore of MP's voting for remain against the previous referendum results would just see the likes of Farage et al getting more traction. To get remain it would have to come from the people, hence the second referendum with remain and no deal as the options. (I would say remain, May's deal, no deal) but that would just lead to Brexiteers claiming that the ballot split the leave vote and favoured remain so isn't viable).

The other potential option is to get an idea of what the public want by putting all the different facets like customs union/freedom of movement etc on a sheet and saying to you want to keep or lose them so the government can actually approach the negotiations with an idea of exactly which bits the people most wanted to keep/lose. But in that scenario I reckon you'd end up with every single option being to keep them and thus we wouldn't actually want to leave any part at all. Plus it'd be pretty complicated to do.
 

Kingokings204

Well-Known Member

Grendel

Well-Known Member
There’s data that suggests lab lost 70% of their votes to pro remain parties so don’t be so sure.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Irrelevant as this isn’t a general election - labour would lose masses of seats in the north and will be finished
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
If there was a general election the obvious thing from a Tory perspective to do is do s deal with Farage

Promise immediate exit from the Eu and of labour now side with remain get Farage to only put brexit candidates on key labour areas who want leave. Stand the Tory candidates down. Labour would get smashed in these seats

Boris Johnson would be s hopeless PM but would be a very good general election vote winner and there is every chance he’d get through
 

djr8369

Well-Known Member
If there was a general election the obvious thing from a Tory perspective to do is do s deal with Farage

Promise immediate exit from the Eu and of labour now side with remain get Farage to only put brexit candidates on key labour areas who want leave. Stand the Tory candidates down. Labour would get smashed in these seats

Boris Johnson would be s hopeless PM but would be a very good general election vote winner and there is every chance he’d get through

Quite possibly how it will play out but the fallout from no deal will surely then destroy the Tories.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
There’s data that suggests lab lost 70% of their votes to pro remain parties so don’t be so sure.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Probably right... but you have to look at locations of those seats. The Labour leave vote is concentrated in the N of England. If Labour loses that they can’t make it up by floaty centrists from the Home Counties.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Quite possibly how it will play out but the fallout from no deal will surely then destroy the Tories.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Businesses are more prepared to accept this than you’d believe. They may not want it but the general view is a resolution will be had

The negotiating strategy all along was totally wrong. The strategy should have been to prepare for leave first on the worst terms and not even speak to the Eu until then. Instead May is like some sales manager whose got some dealer support to offer her dealers. She’s told the maximum is 5 grand but get as low as you can

Every dealer May stumbles into she drops her trousers and hands the 5 grand over

The Eu knew under her they’d be safe, now not so. The tactics on both sides will change very quickly
 

djr8369

Well-Known Member
Probably right... but you have to look at locations of those seats. The Labour leave vote is concentrated in the N of England. If Labour loses that they can’t make it up by floaty centrists from the Home Counties.

They’ll take some damage no doubt.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

djr8369

Well-Known Member
Businesses are more prepared to accept this than you’d believe. They may not want it but the general view is a resolution will be had

The negotiating strategy all along was totally wrong. The strategy should have been to prepare for leave first on the worst terms and not even speak to the Eu until then. Instead May is like some sales manager whose got some dealer support to offer her dealers. She’s told the maximum is 5 grand but get as low as you can

Every dealer May stumbles into she drops her trousers and hands the 5 grand over

The Eu knew under her they’d be safe, now not so. The tactics on both sides will change very quickly

They could have done that if they hadn’t started the article 50 process so soon.

How prepared for no deal do you think business is and what are you basing it on?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I was going to put that in too, but the furore of MP's voting for remain against the previous referendum results would just see the likes of Farage et al getting more traction. To get remain it would have to come from the people, hence the second referendum with remain and no deal as the options. (I would say remain, May's deal, no deal) but that would just lead to Brexiteers claiming that the ballot split the leave vote and favoured remain so isn't viable).

The other potential option is to get an idea of what the public want by putting all the different facets like customs union/freedom of movement etc on a sheet and saying to you want to keep or lose them so the government can actually approach the negotiations with an idea of exactly which bits the people most wanted to keep/lose. But in that scenario I reckon you'd end up with every single option being to keep them and thus we wouldn't actually want to leave any part at all. Plus it'd be pretty complicated to do.

It’s probably about right. The problem is people think they can rewrite history and the problem goes away. Win a second vote (call it a people’s vote and hope that sounds better) even by 0.1% and it goes away

It will never go away. As history tells you re writing history ends up with history repeating itself again and again

Once it was obvious there would be problems a second ballot with a series of leave options should have been presented

Acknowledge the result but acknowledge many clearly want close ties with the Eu. So Norway option Canada option etc. Have a long period of debate and the public vote it’s preferred choice - we will one day leave the Eu and the ways it’s going we are just going to fall out
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
They could have done that if they hadn’t started the article 50 process so soon.

How prepared for no deal do you think business is and what are you basing it on?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I’m basing it on my own experience with the company I worked for
 

djr8369

Well-Known Member
I’m basing it on my own experience with the company I worked for

Interestingly, so I am. Their verdict was it would cause huge expense and make the company unviable.

My worry (again based on where I work) is that companies are scared to public say what they think the consequences of no deal would be like as it’s labelled as scare mongering and they also don’t want to be seen as interfering in the public process.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Interestingly, so I am. Their verdict was it would cause huge expense and make the company unviable.

My worry (again based on where I work) is that companies are scared to public say what they think the consequences of no deal would be like as it’s labelled as scare mongering and they also don’t want to be seen as interfering in the public process.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No company knows and if you are a non Eu exporter even in relatively short term the impact on currency would be positive

Companies should have been preparing but remember we’ve had crashes of immeasurable scale in the last which have caused damage but in the end the economy is big enough to self repair and as I say it’s not as if it’s going to be very long before a resolution is then found
 

SkyBlueDom26

Well-Known Member
Vote of confidence. Lab Lib SNP plus some older remainer Tories against the rest of the Tories and DUP. Bye bye Tories. GE and/or PV. Parliament is at an impasse, put the cards on the table and let the people decide on the Brexit we now can see versus remain.
Leave would win by a bigger margin
 

SBAndy

Well-Known Member
I’m basing it on my own experience with the company I worked for

If I’m not mistaken that business had already gone down the route of moving some aspects of production outside the EU. That would obviously lead them to be better prepared than others. Think about all the SMEs and their lack of resources when thinking about tackling Brexit. It isn’t quite as easy as saying one’s prepared so they’re all prepared.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
The problem is in the time trading on WTO many business would go bust, relocate or at the very least completely restructure their supply chains. They then might need to do the same once a deal is reached. WTO just isn’t a practical option.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I agree entirely, but at least it would give a definitive set of rules we would be trading by and could focus some of those who are under the impression leave means "cherry pick the bits we want and get rid of the rest", especially those in the business world wanting Brexit of exactly what it is that they're voting for.
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
Remoaners**** They need to get a grip, embarrassing the way they go on

Would probably want a 3rd vote when they lose again


Haha. Brexit is a Brexiteer mess. They voted for something they hadn’t agreed on beforehand and fully misunderstood the attitude of the EU, how the EU works and how much damage Brexit would do to the UK.
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
No company knows and if you are a non Eu exporter even in relatively short term the impact on currency would be positive

Companies should have been preparing but remember we’ve had crashes of immeasurable scale in the last which have caused damage but in the end the economy is big enough to self repair and as I say it’s not as if it’s going to be very long before a resolution is then found

A pound collapse would be advantageous for some in the short term. But companies relying on imported parts in manufacturing would have to pay more for imports. The advantage would soon evaporate.

The assumption that the economy is big enough to survive in the end is probably right, but you have to endure self inflicted hardship in the meantime and there is no guarantee that the economy will be in the same place it would have been if you hadn’t had Brexit. The likelihood is that the prophesied trade deals will not be as advantageous as those we have and are working on through the EU as we will be a distressed trading partner. A poor negotiating position to start from.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top