Cash is King.
One “feary” theory at the outset was that DK had taken on (£30m? £60m? whatever) of debt at a point where we had saleable assets of (and this is just plucking numbers tbh) of £30m or whatever to balance the books.
It would have been a disappointing but not hugely shocking surprise if DK had cashed in on Vik and Gus in this window and said:
“we’ve had to do that to balance the books from the SISU days - debt / equity deals are complex and by doing this we now have a really strong base to build. It would be irresponsible if I saddled the club with debt at the current high costs of finance. I’m a sensible businessman and have done what I thought best and 100% of the money has gone into the club finances and I’ve not taken any of it out. I trust MR to work his magic etc”
(I know it’s pie sky but just for illustration)
We would be annoyed, but with the right PR message we would have just cracked on supporting the club. After all, as fans we’ve been through the wringer and could probably accept that being secure is preferable to being in debt.
This time last year, if someone would have said we are talking about signing £8m World Cup strikers and were amongst the favourites to go up I’d have told them to have a check up from the neck up.
Anyway, fair play to Doug or (if) whoever is playing backstop.
Good times.