Is there video and pictures? The CPS seem to think there is only audio and not of any assault?Read up a bit on abusive relationships then you'll have an idea. Plus he's minted.
Her staying with him should negate the fact he physically and sexually abused her. She literally has video, audio and pictures of what he did. It's no wonder women don't come forward when it happens to them when people are so easy to dismiss what he did with all that evidence.
Is there video and pictures? The CPS seem to think there is only audio and not of any assault?
If there is video of a sexual attack then the CPS will proceed even without the victim. As I said the regularly proceed with abuse cases without the victim and even when the victim is a hostile witness. The Caroline Flack case was one such a case.
And that is the reason there is lack of appetite to pursue from the CPS - other than 1 audio clip there isn’t any further corroborative evidence.There were some swirling around on social media when it happened but none are of the actual assault.
And that is the reason there is lack of appetite to pursue from the CPS - other than 1 audio clip there isn’t any further corroborative evidence.
As someone said earlier - he’s a misogynistic c**t, but no evidence of any further wrongdoing
Sadly there isn't, the audio ends before any assault occurs, she has withdrawn her support and would testify no actual assault took place.There is evidence of verbal abuse, sexual assault and attempted rape. It's all in the audio and transcript.
The stats are something like 67k rapes happen a year, and only 1.7k perpetrators are convicted. Under your logic, those 65.3k are just misogynistic c**ts, as they haven't been convicted.
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
No you’re assuming there’s sexual assault and attempted rape - the audio ends prior to that.There is evidence of verbal abuse, sexual assault and attempted rape. It's all in the audio and transcript.
The stats are something like 67k rapes happen a year, and only 1.7k perpetrators are convicted. Under your logic, those 65.3k are just misogynistic c**ts, as they haven't been convicted.
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
Typically she makes it all about herRachel Riley, a Man Utd fan who grew up in that well known Manchester suburb of Southend, might withdraw her support.
Mason Greenwood: TV presenter Rachel Riley says she'll stop supporting Man Utd if forward stays
Television presenter Rachel Riley says she will stop supporting Manchester United if forward Mason Greenwood stays at the club.www.bbc.co.uk
I’d say the same thing regardless of the gender of the person saying it. She’s welcome to support SouthendThe irony of the last two posts, on a thread such as this, is off the scale!
A well known female celebrity speaks out against the abhorrent behaviour of Greenwood, when she really didn’t have to, and then rather than supporting her stance she gets slagged off for not being from Manchester and ‘typically’ making it ‘all about her’.
And people wonder why some women don’t feel comfortable with calling these things out…..
I would also say they same thing if she was a bloke called Dave.The irony of the last two posts, on a thread such as this, is off the scale!
A well known female celebrity speaks out against the abhorrent behaviour of Greenwood, when she really didn’t have to, and then rather than supporting her stance she gets slagged off for not being from Manchester and ‘typically’ making it ‘all about her’.
And people wonder why some women don’t feel comfortable with calling these things out…..
That David ODay is a nasty peice of work. Worst of all he thinks people like him and he's one of the 'lads'. Vile cretin he isThe irony of the last two posts, on a thread such as this, is off the scale!
A well known female celebrity speaks out against the abhorrent behaviour of Greenwood, when she really didn’t have to, and then rather than supporting her stance she gets slagged off for not being from Manchester and ‘typically’ making it ‘all about her’.
And people wonder why some women don’t feel comfortable with calling these things out…..
You really are a horrible individual.I would also say they same thing if she was a bloke called Dave.
Now fuck off you sanctimonious waste of a wank.
Shades of Anne Lucas sneaking into the Ricoh in disguise...The irony of the last two posts, on a thread such as this, is off the scale!
A well known female celebrity speaks out against the abhorrent behaviour of Greenwood, when she really didn’t have to, and then rather than supporting her stance she gets slagged off for not being from Manchester and ‘typically’ making it ‘all about her’.
And people wonder why some women don’t feel comfortable with calling these things out…..
You about to try offer me out for a fight again?You really are a horrible individual.
I agree that Greenwood probably shouldn’t return to professional football. I disagree with people from [checks notes] Essex supporting the likes of Man Utd. Apparently what Greenwood has done is the final straw but Ryan Giggs’ shenanigans over most of his adult life didn’t meet the threshold.Sorry Rachel, you almost made a decent moral stand there, but unfortunately you can’t support your dad’s team at all because it’s been deemed you live too far away by [checks notes] Brighton Sky Blue.
I also don't think they should take him back.I agree that Greenwood probably shouldn’t return to professional football. I disagree with people from [checks notes] Essex supporting the likes of Man Utd. Apparently what Greenwood has done is the final straw but Ryan Giggs’ shenanigans over most of his adult life didn’t meet the threshold.
Just think it’s a bit weird to call someone out who’s trying to take a moral stance (that you agree with!) because they’re not morally pure enough on another totally unrelated and comparatively trivial issue.I agree that Greenwood probably shouldn’t return to professional football. I disagree with people from [checks notes] Essex supporting the likes of Man Utd. Apparently what Greenwood has done is the final straw but Ryan Giggs’ shenanigans over most of his adult life didn’t meet the threshold.
The South East must have a particularly high concentration of Mancunian diaspora then. Man Utd have in the past welcomed back Eric Cantona despite him kung fu kicking a fan at a game, appointed Ryan Giggs as manager despite him having the morals of a sewer rat, and also welcomed back Harry Maguire despite his antics in Greece. They also stood by Dwight Yorke during his more ‘frisky’ years.Just think it’s a bit weird to call someone out who’s trying to take a moral stance (that you agree with!) because they’re not morally pure enough on another totally unrelated and comparatively trivial issue.
(Personally I’ve got no problem if you support the team your parents support, even if they’ve since moved away - I know my kids will be anyway)
I always find “supporting your home club” a bit archaic.The South East must have a particularly high concentration of Mancunian diaspora then. Man Utd have in the past welcomed back Eric Cantona despite him kung fu kicking a fan at a game, appointed Ryan Giggs as manager despite him having the morals of a sewer rat, and also welcomed back Harry Maguire despite his antics in Greece. They also stood by Dwight Yorke during his more ‘frisky’ years.
Why is this case the threshold? Supporting a club primarily because of how good the team is versus it being your home club, you’ll be less bothered about not following them anymore.
I don’t know why this is the threshold but if she’s doing the right thing now then I’m not too fussed.The South East must have a particularly high concentration of Mancunian diaspora then. Man Utd have in the past welcomed back Eric Cantona despite him kung fu kicking a fan at a game, appointed Ryan Giggs as manager despite him having the morals of a sewer rat, and also welcomed back Harry Maguire despite his antics in Greece. They also stood by Dwight Yorke during his more ‘frisky’ years.
Why is this case the threshold? Supporting a club primarily because of how good the team is versus it being your home club, you’ll be less bothered about not following them anymore.
put me on ignore again......You about to try offer me out for a fight again?
And miss this?put me on ignore again......
When we signed Marlon King did you stop going to matches?I don’t know why this is the threshold but if she’s doing the right thing now then I’m not too fussed.
But maybe you’re right and she should just apologise for her ideological impurity and stay quiet instead.
Ann Lucas did, and got castigated and ridiculed by the club's manager and fans for doing so.When we signed Marlon King did you stop going to matches?
No, and I suppose that precludes me from any and all social activism in the future.When we signed Marlon King did you stop going to matches?
OK, so let's suppose we were to sign a similar character in the next few weeks. Would you stop going then?No, and I suppose that precludes me from any and all social activism in the future.
Not that I should be even supporting Coventry at all, there was a perfectly good Southern League team right there on my doorstep. Shameful.
Similar to Marlon King or Mason Greenwood? I wouldn’t stop supporting the team, but I would be firmly opposed to either signing. Would I be allowed to speak out against it or have I missed my window in your eyes?OK, so let's suppose we were to sign a similar character in the next few weeks. Would you stop going then?
For some reason a disagreement gets conflated with supporting censorshipSimilar to Marlon King or Mason Greenwood? I wouldn’t stop supporting the team, but I would be firmly opposed to either signing. Would I be allowed to speak out against it or have I missed my window in your eyes?
Honestly lads, this morality points system is crazy, just wanted to tweet about Mason Greenwood but all the posts have been reserved for the 1000+ brigade who’ve been going on since the Marlon King days, won’t even get a shot at Wembley at this rate.For some reason a disagreement gets conflated with supporting censorship
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?