SimonGilbert
Telegraph Tea Boy
She has no "current" arrangement apparently. But has in the past
Are you sure she's not a sponsor? This seems to indicate she is:
http://www.ccfc.co.uk/news/article/demarco-highlights-sponsorship-1005537.aspx
Unbiased view.......... @stevecarpo: #SkyBlues fans wanting answers will not get them at the stadium forum - very much an ideas meeting - relaxed & positve atmosphere tonight...
She has no "current" arrangement apparently. But has in the past
Are you blind, how is it independent?
Sandra Garlick - not a season ticket holder, a consultant paid by SISU. And a sponsor of the club at Sixfields.
Phil Osborne - not a season ticket holder, an architectural consultant paid by SISU.
Eleanor Deeley - not a season ticket holder, a property consultant paid by SISU.
And a set of fans who are in the minority of the fanbase that go to Sixfields..
It is a biased forum of the compliant minority led by paid consultants.
Maybe she did make that call?
She has no "current" arrangement apparently. But has in the past
Well her only explanation/evidence she was willing to say (per the Telegraph) was why would they go to all this trouble if they weren't serious. That's a bit like when my girlfriend comes home and asks why I've gone to the trouble of clearing my Internet history. Maybe we're both hiding something.
Emotional and irrelevant
As I have mentioned I may have had a drink tonight.
But I read that as your signature.
I love beer.
She has no "current" arrangement apparently. But has in the past
Proviso 'if we don't get back to the Ricoh (and I personally don't think we will?), believe me it will Happen' PUSB!
Like I say. I don't think she's in cahoots with Fisher. More that she's a genuine fan who believes in the project. They do exist.
Really not not sure how or when people would've asked. It was made clear from the start we couldn't talk location as none of them knew it.
Proviso 'if we don't get back to the Ricoh (and I personally don't think we will?), believe me it will Happen' PUSB!
The more I read this the more I like shemee and the more I see the rest of you are cretins
The more I read this the more I like shemee and the more I see the rest of you are cretins
You still don't get it do you, pity!
I'll state again 'if we don't go back to the Ricoh (and time is running out), believe me it will happen. PUSB!
Just got out of frankly a rather dull meeting.
Just a few thoughts:
Garlick seems to hate the Ricoh.
CBRE lady seemed to be reading prewritten script and looked shit scared.
Architect guy seemed confident.
Crowd was quite old, fairly sparse. Capacity was mostly discussed, with a few saying too small but guy saying he hates how big the Ricoh is getting biggest round of applause.
Point was raised about devisiveness of a ST only meeting, Ms Garlick disagrees (she'd get on very well with Fisher, is a graduate of the same charm school IMO).
Architect says plan is modular, 12>15>20-25k but site allows further expansion to say 30k by enlarging the envelope. Highways planning for final capacity would need granting at first stage so no hitches. Capacity upgrade would take roughly 6-9 months with that stadium "still playable".
Very early stages, CBRE woman won't give time until planning app, but a year is a reasonable time. None of this is slow she says, all standard business practice.
We will get input on interior decoration, what we want in the "fans zone" (And here was me thinking the whole stadium was a fans zone) in terms of which pie and pint stands we want. Kept going on about how we were never consulted about the Ricoh.
Was a very weird atmosphere. Location was claimed to be unknown by all 3. Questions were either unanswerable or drivel about wanting the tunnel to come out near the fans.
Garlick claims it's her forum and the club will be invited in later , though a CCFC employee seemed to be checking names on the door, she wet to great lengths to say he has no current commercial relationship with the club. There as a fan.
Oh and a couple of pissed off old chaps in City tops were sat outside moaning about not being allowed in, Valiant?
Was all a bit weird.
The more I read this the more I like shemee and the more I see the rest of you are cretins
are you sure about? i belive tynan scope was there from the clubPoint of order - Sandra Garlick isn't being paid and she's not a sponsor.
I'll leave it to the readers to decide how independent it is though.
Nobody representing the club was there tonight.
are you sure about? i belive tynan scope was there from the club
dream on.According to her, and the club, she did.
Nobody representing the club was on the panel or took part in the discussions, to be more precise.
Sandra did say board members, players and the manager would be invited to future meetings to answer questions and provide input.
So what does it hope to achieve?
Does she think it is relevant when the club have yet to have serious conversations about planning permission or bought any land.
Maybe when that happens it would be a good idea to set up a group.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?