J
Jack Griffin
Guest
In the first forum he said he was brought in about 1 year ago.
Tonights Forum 07/06/13 (2 Viewers)
- Thread starter Flying Fokker
- Start date
In the first forum he said he was brought in about 1 year ago.
Lord_Nampil
Well-Known Member
So my question was a decent one then? ' What happens if a 3rd party buys ltd......'
dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
I personally felt he really struggled in two areas.
The accounts and why the club is not for sale.
Will be interesting to see these two subjects get really probed.
Also the accountant made reference to this forum showing that this is getting read.
dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
A cracker. If the administrator is neutral and that happens then the FA get to decide who takes the club forward
Delboycov
Active Member
I thought he struggled a lot last night but was allowed to wriggle out of so much as he wasn't really probed when he avoided answering difficult questions. I also thought the accountant gave the impression he really didn't want to be there last night! Never doubted this forum is being monitored by them and I personally believe there have been occasional posters on here with a clear SISU agenda...but of course I'm a paranoid conspiracy theorist ;-) Thanks for the update Don...
Voice_of_Reason
Well-Known Member
Then SISU has to take the Football League to Court to prove the League wrong.
Lord_Nampil
Well-Known Member
Tonight was like going round in circles and then some one mentioned the administration and tim answered, I then had to ask and to be fair to him he answered! And then IMO everything seemed to make sense!
bigfatronssba
Well-Known Member
Still laughing at that.
Mind if I put that picture on Twitter?
oldskyblue58
CCFC Finance Director
wasnt there tonight ....... there are a lot of other good people too who would seem to have put tf on the spot once or twice
was going last night but couldnt get there will try get there monday.
Trouble i find with this process is if you can only ask a question then any pressure on TF is deflected by the next question addressing something else
was going last night but couldnt get there will try get there monday.
Trouble i find with this process is if you can only ask a question then any pressure on TF is deflected by the next question addressing something else
James Smith
Well-Known Member
Yes wouldn't it be great if the next person said my question is "Why haven't you answered the previous fan/speakers question?"
Mary_Mungo_Midge
Well-Known Member
Couldn't you have a code word, universally recognised within the room, that would act as precursor for everyone to shut up when they heard it? If you say the word 'grapefruit' at the end of your question, everyone will know its you
bigfatronssba
Well-Known Member
It doesn't seem as bad for that as at past forums.
There has been a definate shift in the attiudes of Linnell, Eakin and Foster so that if Tim doesn't answer your question you get the chance to follow it up.
J
Jack Griffin
Guest
I think the true extent of their misjudgement of the real attitude of the fanbase has finally become apparent. Pity they were so slow on the uptake.
Broken Hearted Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
What happens if someone buys limited after being assured the GS is in it and they awaard it to holdings then they sue the FL :thinking about:
pw362
Well-Known Member
<p>
<p> </p>
IMO Football league have already decided that SISU will be given the golden share. Why else would they be saying which grounds they would find acceptable for us to move to for the next three years
</p>
<p> </p>
IMO Football league have already decided that SISU will be given the golden share. Why else would they be saying which grounds they would find acceptable for us to move to for the next three years
dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
They can't ignore their question. They have to advise them in case they buy Ltd.
SISU whilst waiting have to get the ball rolling
Last edited:
letsallsingtogether
Well-Known Member
Shame their wasn't more there. only half full that is why the heckling was loader.The first supporter was very good tied them up but all they wanted to do was go to the next one shame really as he never really answered a question that is why a couple left fed up with all the bull.............................
stupot07
Well-Known Member
He was allowed to wriggle out of answering because the crowd were heckling and disrupting answers.
simple_simon
New Member
Great idea
Bluegloucester
New Member
Sisu know absolutely nothing about football , how a club operates and the connection with the supporters. To them it is a business with customers.
dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
Yes frustrating when some key questions were asked. When he flounders don't jeer let the person questioning , screw him down more.
His plan has more illogical floors than a dahli masterpiece.
Just keep probing and it unravels don't jeer and topic hop.
stupot07
Well-Known Member
When I pointed this out earlier, the 'passion' card was thrown at me......
dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
Exactly the FA have to stick to their stance.
dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
Exactly the presenters need to understand a question that doesn't get answered and allow the person to probe..
If it is rubbish then move on.
Last edited:
bigfatronssba
Well-Known Member
The FA will do whatever creates the least amount of work for themselves.
Broken Hearted Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
Thats what they are scared of I would imagine
Grendel
Well-Known Member
Sisu will be the highest bid they will it seems buy it back
bigfatronssba
Well-Known Member
I agree, until football is forced to sort itself out then this will keep happening.
The FA, FL, and PL have all said they will resist political intervention in the game, yet they have yet to prove they are fit to run it.
stupot07
Well-Known Member
The whole games needs a shake up, football shouldn't be exempt from normal business practices. The whole acceptance that a club is expected to make big year on year losses is completely wrong.
bigfatronssba
Well-Known Member
"Normal Business Practice"
georgehudson
Well-Known Member
smoke, mirrors, diatribe, & bluff,
if, any sane person wishes to follow the sisu edict,
then that is your choice,
let justice prevail
if, any sane person wishes to follow the sisu edict,
then that is your choice,
let justice prevail
Flying Fokker
Well-Known Member
.
Off to dictionary dot com Obfuscate:
1. To make so confused or opaque as to be difficult to perceive or understand: "A great effort was made . . . to obscure or obfuscate the truth" (Robert Conquest).
2. To render indistinct or dim; darken: The fog obfuscated the shore.
Flying Fokker
Well-Known Member
Last night was strange. Someone posted that Tim Fisher will talk finance all night.....He has an agenda to slow down and just let the clock tick on...It is his forum, 30 seconds of barracking is letting him off the hook. Must have lost a fair amount of time that way.
Mary_Mungo_Midge
Well-Known Member
That's absolutely and wholly true. But it has a pertinent flip side. The negativity of the financial debate with regards rent, stadium related incomes aside for a moment; the arrangement leaves SISU with a remarkably simple business plan. Match expenditure against oncomes via ticket pricing, plus other streams such as hospitality, the shop, shirt sponsorship, TV revenues and cup runs.
From whatever they can raise in this regard, the costs are subtracted; the rent, the academy, etc.
The income from the list above would be in the parish of £5 to 6m; even with last seasons crowds. Subtract the prime costs, and there should be some £4m balance. From that, they run their football club.
Fisher - holding them up now as a shining light as he has a new agenda - tells us that Yeovil went up with a third if that sum.
We haven't gone up, we haven't stayed within the confines if a simple operating plan, and we've stacked debt - year on year, right up to now.
You can't make the post you did, yet retain any confidence in SISU's ability to run our football club; as those two views would diametrically oppose one another
Last edited:
