Viktor Moving on (1 Viewer)

KenilworthSkyBlue

Well-Known Member
Seems Toney is going to Saudi, so hopefully Arsenal turn their attention back to Vik

I question whether Arsenal's attention was ever fully on Gyokeres to be honest. A lot of the noise in the media feels very agent led.

Personally, I get the feeling that Sesko was pretty much their only target and once that fell through after he signed a new deal they realigned their transfer strategy and looked to focus on other positions instead. They seem pretty content with Havertz and Jesus.
 

SBAndy

Well-Known Member
Wouldn't need to. Doug can import some of their delicacies and shake up the half time entertainment. Choose the poorest playing player from first half and have a public flogging:

Whip it for a ticket?

Clever adaptation of the much famed Yorkshire half time entertainment: Whippet for a Ticket.
 

colinc

Member
I still find it strange that Sporting paid us some money to reduce the sell on fee %. They must have thought there was a good chance of him going to ask to reduce it.

I get why they've done it - more the timing that I don't get.
Did Sporting choose to or was it contractual due to their success (Vic scoring loads and them winning league etc.) ?
 

Skyblueweeman

Well-Known Member
Did Sporting choose to or was it contractual due to their success (Vic scoring loads and them winning league etc.) ?

Confused Power Rangers GIF
 

steve cooper

Well-Known Member
Did Sporting choose to or was it contractual due to their success (Vic scoring loads and them winning league etc.) ?
No, the other addons such as reaching targets were separate. Sporting apparently paid us circa 1M euros to reduce the sell-on to 10% as per our contract. That is 5% of what they originally paid. It will save them somewhere in the region of 3M euros if Vik goes for his sell-on clause.
 

djr8369

Well-Known Member
No, the other addons such as reaching targets were separate. Sporting apparently paid us circa 1M euros to reduce the sell-on to 10% as per our contract. That is 5% of what they originally paid. It will save them somewhere in the region of 3M euros if Vik goes for his sell-on clause.
Wasn’t it reference in the leaked contract in a way that we get either all the add ons or all the sell on percentage, but not both?
 

SwanLane

Well-Known Member
I still find it strange that Sporting paid us some money to reduce the sell on fee %. They must have thought there was a good chance of him going to ask to reduce it.

I get why they've done it - more the timing that I don't get.
They could have been posturing to flush out bids from any interested clubs by making it look like a deal was imminent.
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
He ain't going anywhere I don't think. Has new challenge of champions League footy now and makes sense to tackle it with a team and manager that get best out of him.

Next year he will still go for big money, maybe more with cL goals under his belt
 

SlowerThanPlatt

Well-Known Member
Portugal is essentially a development league and retirement home for top players past their best. I think the issue is he’s playing against little comparable “prime talent”.
 

KenilworthSkyBlue

Well-Known Member
I was indeed

Seems Arsenal just didn't fancy paying the release clause. Sporting wouldn't budge on it

As I've said previously I really don't think they were that interested.

I don't doubt they would've made a loose enquiry, but they likely did that with a number of targets, with a certain fee in mind.

Sesko's release clause was £55m and he was their primary target. They were never going to pay anywhere close to what Gyokeres' is given he's five years older and is playing in a vastly inferior league.
 
Last edited:

biggymania

Well-Known Member
Vik moving now would completely torpedo Sporting's season or make it very hard for them in the domestic and Champions League. Very little chance this happens.

Vik will get a LOT of games in the new format CL so I imagine folks will be watching carefully and if he performs well January window could be interesting.

Here's the list of teams they have:

Home games: Manchester City (England), Arsenal (England), Lille (France), Bologna (Italy).
Away games: Leipzig (Germany), Club Brugge (Belgium), PSV Eindhoven (Netherlands), Sturm Graz (Austria).
 

SwanLane

Well-Known Member
Looking at it now, his RC looks steep. Few clubs spend that sort of money. Even those that do have, to consider the PSR angle which now looks like it is starting to bring transfer values down.

Next year, he’s even older and even less likely to be sold on again at break-even (let alone a profit).

Having thought they’d hold out for something fairly close to their €100m, I think they’d be lucky to get €60 next summer, even if he has another great season.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Looking at it now, his RC looks steep. Few clubs spend that sort of money. Even those that do have, to consider the PSR angle which now looks like it is starting to bring transfer values down.

Next year, he’s even older and even less likely to be sold on again at break-even (let alone a profit).

Having thought they’d hold out for something fairly close to their €100m, I think they’d be lucky to get €60 next summer, even if he has another great season.
Man Utd think little of blowing £80m+ on individual players almost every season.
 

Skyblueweeman

Well-Known Member
Arsenal will absolutely kick themselves when they lose the title to Man City by a few points after their forwards drop them points throughout the season.
Totally agree. I'm not a Premier League manager but when I think of Arsenal, I don't think of them having someone who's a world class out and out striker. Then getting rid of Nketiah and Rowe-Smith leaves them even shorter.

I think it's madness they've not gone for him (or another one to be fair). They need a focal point like Man City have Haaland.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top