Mason Greenwood (1 Viewer)

robbiekeane

Well-Known Member
literally a fucking audio recording of the c**t trying to rape someone and some absolute creatures on here trying to defend him or suggest it’s role play

you are literally the dregs of society, you know who you are
 

Travs

Well-Known Member
Most people believe there should be a legal process. They’re not all rushing to say that though as it adds no value.

And i believe that is what Marty suggested with his opening post, i merely commented to say i agreed with it. No more, no less.

If SBT wants to start with the "bore off" "pub stories" then that's fine, he's obviously formed his opinion of me and i'm not about to spend any time arguing it, as it will go down the usual road on here of another thread ending up in pointless bickering.

Let's hope that justice prevails.... Whilst i have every faith in it getting to court, i sadly think that ultimately his money and footballing connections are likely to see a reduced punishment.
 

Bugsy

Well-Known Member

rob9872

Well-Known Member
I don't 5hink they can stop paying him until he's actually been prosecuted.
Well I'd like to think City aren't paying Mendy. I'd assume withhold it and pay back if innocent as it could drag on for ages.

Edit: and cost millions when he's nor available to play.
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member

Frostie

Well-Known Member
I know they have said he is not involved in anything but haven’t looked at anything today.

Nope, not training or playing but not suspended either so still getting his £100k per week.

Not sure there are many walks of life where you can be arrested over a crime as heinous as this without being suspended by your employer.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
Yeah, sorry, that's my eyes deceiving me. I thought TGP said "playing" not "paying." 🤦
 

Wanda

New Member
What the fuck is up with these people. Ched Evans, Mendy, Greenwood. Literally can have anything and everything they ever wanted but can’t be told no

Not sure why evans has been included. I’m glad he’s got his career somewhat back on track
 

Bugsy

Well-Known Member

duffer

Well-Known Member
Not really, the Court have had their say on the matter and that’s that. His crime was cheating on his girlfriend who I believe has forgiven him.

If "cheating on your girlfriend" means having sex with a woman too drunk to remember it, in a threesome with someone else and encouraging your mates to secretly film it from outside, then yes, I guess that's what he did.

He was cleared on appeal because he could spend tens of thousands to dredge up and 'find' witnesses to the victim's previous sexual history, and use that as a justification.

If you think that's the same as 'cheating on your girlfriend', then you're as big a c**t as he is. Fuck off back under your rock.
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
If "cheating on your girlfriend" means having sex with a woman too drunk to remember it, in a threesome with someone else and encouraging your mates to secretly film it from outside, then yes, I guess that's what he did.

He was cleared on appeal because he could spend tens of thousands to dredge up and 'find' witnesses to the victim's previous sexual history, and use that as a justification.

If you think that's the same as 'cheating on your girlfriend', then you're as big a c**t as he is. Fuck off back under your rock.
Don't let him rattle you Duffer it's Boosh the 8th!
 

robbiekeane

Well-Known Member
You would imagine that will be his defence or something along those lines.
Already had people here making it for him. Very odd indeed


What evidence is there? a few photo's of bruises, which could be from anything, and what could be deemed as a bit of shit role playing. Rape fantasy is fairlyy common amongst women. I'm not saying hes either guilty or innocent, let the police carry out their investigation and go from there.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top