I don't get what?
More like you scan read the link you put on. But when you consider what was said it wasn't the good news for the EU like you first thought. Maybe you thought that the Daily Mail was cherry picking the juicy bits. But it wasn't. Now you are picking fault with them for not using more points.
You just couldn't make it up in real life
Not at all the mail did all they needed to do to satisfy their readership, print a couple of quotes and don't actually link the report, that's enough to get them hot under the collar. it's poor journalism but it suits the readership.
There's also an IMF report on the effects of Brexit on the UK which doesn't paint the rosiest of pictures, (also on their website), but for some reason no one linked that, I wonder why?
The jist of that report is that their is a great level of uncertainty around the UKs economic future in the event of an exit (which hasn't happened yet by the way), but I'm sure you'll dismiss that report.
You seem to be confusing me with someones who's vehemently pro EU, I'm not, as I've stated, I voted remain as the lesser of 2 evils.
I believe brexit will be a bad thing but I wouldn't be shocked if it wasn't I'm just amazed at how cock sure leavers are that everything's going to come up roses when there's a minefield of conflicting information which they either rehash or ignore according to their agenda.
In my opinion if it's relevant get it out there, hence I linked the report and not a couple of salacious quotes.