The EU: In, out, shake it all about.... (83 Viewers)

As of right now, how are thinking of voting? In or out

  • Remain

    Votes: 23 37.1%
  • Leave

    Votes: 35 56.5%
  • Undecided

    Votes: 3 4.8%
  • Not registered or not intention to vote

    Votes: 1 1.6%

  • Total voters
    62
  • Poll closed .

Astute

Well-Known Member
Again. Just because Junker is a c**t. That doesn’t make everyone else innocent.

I thought you were neutral and brought balance to the debate? If that was the case you’d appreciate the comparison and it is a valid comparison in the interest of balance.
Mart definitely needs some balance brought with his views. And so do you at times.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
Basically yes.

The negativity about the EU comes from the likes of Farage, Gove, Banks, Wigmore and BoJo. All of whom have been mean with the truth.
So Juncker says they are in very difficult times yet you say it is all positivity for the EU.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
Juncker has nothing to do with the City.
But like I pointed out before several British MP's got sent to prison for making false expenses claims for less than 20k. They are government not banks.

Juncker did what he did. He got rewarded with a top EU job.
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
Yes...exactly why the EU leaders want financial institutions to move too. They want a slice of that for themselves!

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

You are over the top. We are leaving. We leave the EU and therefore could lose our passporting rights for financial services. It is our decision. As you keep pointing out. The financial institutions will have to move because of Brexit not because the EU wants a slice of it.
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
Ah...there is a pattern forming with you that Mart always demonstrates too

UK: differing opinions = argument, stupid, clueless, lacking clear direction & we are doomed
EU countries/German coalition members: differing opinions = healthy debate & they will find a positive solution

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

UK .. yes seems to be about that. See what happens today.

Germany: I don't know about healthy debate. I never even made a comment on that. I just said you should wait to see the outcome before you jump in. The rest is your usual BS.
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
Well let us wait & see how soon & what 'stronger EU regulation of finance' looks like. If it is anything like their border policy that few have given much attention to un the past...it will probably just be hot air

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

What are you on about? The have always paid attention to the borders, but the pressure of a devasting wars broke the system temporarily.
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
Ureka! So Britain is most definitely NOT 3yrs behind due to Brexit. We have agreed something !

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

No. It couldn't be could it because Brexit only happened in 2016. But... it can only now start negotiations which will take 3 years ( if successful ). The EU suppliers are further advanced.
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
Just because they haven't demonstrated it to you? Who on earth do you think you are?

The fact is, you have swallowed the EU position on everything...whether that publicly stated position is genuinely the state of play even currently, is another question.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

I am following the news as much as anyone else. That's all. They have not convinced me that they are aware of the consequences, either that or they are not bothered about them as they will probaly benefit personally in some other way.

Being in the EU is the staus quo. That is the position. The UK is leaving. It is up to the UK to have a unified position and say how they see the future relationship. The EU has it's rules and all remaining 27 countries have to abide by them. That's it. Now, do we still have a government?
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
You are over the top. We are leaving. We leave the EU and therefore could lose our passporting rights for financial services. It is our decision. As you keep pointing out. The financial institutions will have to move because of Brexit not because the EU wants a slice of it.
Just like Juncker is taking the piss out of Switzerland over the same thing. And they are still paying into the system.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
Name one person on here who has said that he has done nothing wrong. You can't.
So should he have a top job in the EU so he can lead investigations into what he did? He should be nowhere near power.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Doesn't alter anything. You know well what I mean.

Not really. Many production decisions have been made by JLR in the last couple of years which show its intent far more than Brexit bluster
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
So should he have a top job in the EU so he can lead investigations into what he did? He should be nowhere near power.

There is a lot of that in the world... and no, I think investigations should be taken out by independent special councils as in the USA.
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
Not really. Many production decisions have been made by JLR in the last couple of years which show its intent far more than Brexit bluster

In the last couple of years being the operative sentence.. has the new factory near Cov been confirmed yet?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
In the last couple of years being the operative sentence.. has the new factory near Cov been confirmed yet?

Not at all the operative sentence as the strategic decisions were made years before that.

The factory I assume you refer to is the engineering and design centres. Yes they will of course happen.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top