Search results

I dont want to argue either I would much rather talk about the football. There are a couple of things. If you dont want to keep raking up the past, why enter these threads? Let them be, as you said you have made your point, unless you want to keep arguing it? Secondly I dont think anyone...

If that is your motivation then you are acting like an arse. I doubt it though, at present it seems to be your party line when you cant back up your arguments with evidence. If you have a point to make, make it, don't pretend you are here for the wind up, as I thought you were bigger than that.

Very good point reg, I totally agree.

Party and Linnell just dont seem to go hand in hand.

I certainly recall that the baove was the case, and as I have mentioned before in long gone posts, SISU were the COUNCILS preferred bidder, as they rejected everyone else.

Congrats AFC! I look back to those days with happiness, particularly when my 15 year old son is giving me the benefit of his wisdom ;)

You said it yourself we need facts.....so why bother posting supposition based on nothing to try to prove your point. :facepalm:

Apologies Calista, as you know I was just playing devils advocate with Italia. Re the percentage issue, I am keeping out of that one, as I know its already caused some debate and i think I am best out of it ;) We have a lot of CCFC supporting years between us, lets hope in the not too distant...

To be honest if he wasnt spotted at the Wednesday game I would have forgotten he was with us.

I am sure Calista will be very happy you think his posts are drivel

Is that about you Otis, or the club? ;)

To be fair Fernando, whilst Duckenfield should never have lied, they should also be looking further up the chain of command at the time, for putting the job in the hands of someone ill trained and equipped for such an event. As I said before the Home Office and FA also have a lot to answer for...

Perhaps you should be addressing that to Calista. He made the reference. How is it if someone disgarees with you you ask for evidence/proof, but when someone doesnt you let it pass without judgement?

If you read my post, it also criticises the government.

I thought you didnt critcise people who went to Sixfields. A bit hypoctitical in my opinion.

Now if you said Roy Race.....

I Dont think I am as old as you :whistle:;)

A rightful verdict, but sadly this was Football Policing in the 80's, poorly run, little training and poepl like Duckenfield who wasnt up to the task in charge. Aside from the fact Duckenfiled and those above were incompetent, the FA are complicit in allowing the game to be at a stadium that...

I was just impressed we got 15 pages out of something no one knows the exact truth about. Still we can argue well over supposition ;)